- discuss - lists.mariadb.org

[Maria-discuss] New Question: ST_AsGeoJSON Support
by AskMonty KB 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "Geographic Features" by jerome_savin. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/st_asgeojson-support/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- Hi, Are there some plans to support ST_AsGeoJSON function ? Will ST_AsGeoJSON be available soon ? Many Thanks. -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/st_asgeojson-support/

1 0

[Maria-discuss] Odd behavior with query and connection pool
by Stu Smith 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

Hello, Forgive me for reporting this on the behalf of some other developers, I will gather more details as needed. But the basic problem we're having is with a query that: - is always fast the first time ( < 3 seconds ) - is very slow the following time, when using a connection pool (~ 30 seconds) - is pretty fast the following time, when not using a connection pool (5 or 6 seconds) This is even on a single DB with no other load. It's a fairly complicated query with sub queries, grouping, and such. I've been told it creates two temp tables. I know this is not a whole lot to go one - but are there any pointer for connection pool vs no connection pool on a lightly loaded DB? This was actually tried and reproduced with multiple connection pools - hikari-db, c3p0, and apache connection pool. Take care, -stu

3 2

[Maria-discuss] R: Odd behavior with query and connection pool
by Federico Razzoli 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

Weird issue. I'm trying to figure out how the connection pool can add an overhead to a single query. The only case I can think is if you use a network storage engine (Federated, Connect, Spider) pointing to tables on localhost. Is this the case? More likely... are you sure this problem is caused by the connection pool? * After the first execution, do a SHOW STATUS. Then FLUSH STATUS. Then execute again and, if it takes long time, do another SHOW STATUS. Post your results here, so we can see what happened. * While the query takes a long time, try a SHOW PROCESSLIST from another client. See if the connection is waiting for a lock. Regards Federico -------------------------------------------- Mar 14/6/16, Stu Smith <stu26code(a)gmail.com> ha scritto: Oggetto: [Maria-discuss] Odd behavior with query and connection pool A: maria-discuss(a)lists.launchpad.net Data: Martedì 14 giugno 2016, 03:36 Hello, Forgive me for reporting this on the behalf of some other developers, I will gather more details as needed. But the basic problem we're having is with a query that: - is always fast the first time ( < 3 seconds ) - is very slow the following time, when using a connection pool (~ 30 seconds) - is pretty fast the following time, when not using a connection pool (5 or 6 seconds) This is even on a single DB with no other load. It's a fairly complicated query with sub queries, grouping, and such. I've been told it creates two temp tables. I know this is not a whole lot to go one - but are there any pointer for connection pool vs no connection pool on a lightly loaded DB? This was actually tried and reproduced with multiple connection pools - hikari-db, c3p0, and apache connection pool. Take care, -stu -----Segue allegato----- _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss(a)lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

1 0

[Maria-discuss] New Question: the difference
by AskMonty KB 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "What is in the Different MariaDB Releases?" by hongyan_0318_54417. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/the-difference/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- About MariaDB I am a new boy,now I am using version 5.5.36 ,I want to upgrade version to 10.0.2 ,so the quesion is what's the question between them ,my English is poor ,give me a simply apply please ,thanks a lot . -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/the-difference/

1 0

[Maria-discuss] F5 iRules for galera
by Umarzuki Mochlis 14 Jun '16

14 Jun '16

I found a article related to monitoring galera at https://devcentral.f5.com/articles/monitoring-open-source-databases-with-bi…. but it did no into detail of iRules used for multi-master. Anyone have sample(s) to share? Mariadb 10.1 Big-IP 11

1 0

[Maria-discuss] Problems with running out of connections in cluster
by Lee Bennett 13 Jun '16

13 Jun '16

Hi We are running a 7 node cluster (6 data nodes and 1 arbiter node) which span 2 data centers using version 10.1.13. We have had several occasions where the application have gone off and created so many connections that the max connections are filled up which leads to the database becoming unresponsive. The connections cannot be killed and and in the ‘killed’ state forever. Today when this occurred all six cluster node maxed out on connections. The only way to get the servers back is by restarting the databases but when the first node we restarted it tried to connect to the cluster is to IST it could not connected. After shutdown a second node the cluster seemed to sort its self out and everything came back. Is anyone aware of any bugs that might cause this issue. Regards LB

1 0

[Maria-discuss] New Question: MariaDB Monitoring Using MONyog
by AskMonty KB 13 Jun '16

13 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "MariaDB FAQ" by palash.harchandani93_43595. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-monitoring-using-monyog/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- can we get summary of all the servers registered which are online and which are not with help of charts like in OEM?? -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-monitoring-using-monyog/

1 0

[Maria-discuss] New Question: MariaDB with Galera on RedHat 7.2 not starting
by AskMonty KB 12 Jun '16

12 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "Starting and Stopping MariaDB" by veselin_vasilev_g. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-with-galera-on-redhat-72-not-starting/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- Hi, can someone please help as I couldn't find relevant information online. When trying to initialize the first node of the cluster, I get this: Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: wsrep_load(): loading provider library '/usr/lib64/galera/libgalera_smm.so' Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: wsrep_load(): Galera 25.3.15(r3578) by Codership Oy <info(a)codership.com> loaded Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: CRC-32C: using hardware acceleration. Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Found saved state: 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:-1 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Passing config to GCS: base_dir = /var/lib/mysql/; base_host = 172.20.1.56; bas Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510378977024 [Note] WSREP: Service thread queue flushed. Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Assign initial position for certification: -1, protocol version: -1 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: wsrep_sst_grab() Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Start replication Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Setting initial position to 00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000:-1 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: protonet asio version 0 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: Using CRC-32C for message checksums. Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: backend: asio Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Warning] WSREP: access file(/var/lib/mysql//gvwstate.dat) failed(No such file or directory) Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: restore pc from disk failed Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: GMCast version 0 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: (b5e7b88e, 'tcp://0.0.0.0:4567') listening at tcp://0.0.0.0:4567 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: (b5e7b88e, 'tcp://0.0.0.0:4567') multicast: , ttl: 1 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: EVS version 0 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: gcomm: connecting to group 'galera_cluster', peer '172.20.1.56:,172.20.1.57:,17 Jun 12 11:14:40 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:40 140510611449984 [Warning] WSREP: (b5e7b88e, 'tcp://0.0.0.0:4567') address 'tcp://172.20.1.56:4567' points to Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:43 140510611449984 [Warning] WSREP: no nodes coming from prim view, prim not possible Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:43 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: view(view_id(NON_PRIM,b5e7b88e,1) memb { Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: b5e7b88e,0 Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: } joined { Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: } left { Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: } partitioned { Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: }) Jun 12 11:14:43 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:14:43 140510611449984 [Warning] WSREP: last inactive check more than PT1.5S ago (PT3.50184S), skipping check Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [Note] WSREP: view((empty)) Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] WSREP: failed to open gcomm backend connection: 110: failed to reach primary view: 11 Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: at gcomm/src/pc.cpp:connect():162 Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] WSREP: gcs/src/gcs_core.cpp:gcs_core_open():208: Failed to open backend connection: - Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] WSREP: gcs/src/gcs.cpp:gcs_open():1379: Failed to open channel 'galera_cluster' at 'g Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] WSREP: gcs connect failed: Connection timed out Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] WSREP: wsrep::connect(gcomm://172.20.1.56,172.20.1.57,172.20.1.58) failed: 7 Jun 12 11:15:13 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local mysqld[10404]: 2016-06-12 11:15:13 140510611449984 [ERROR] Aborting Jun 12 11:15:14 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local systemd[1]: mariadb.service: main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Jun 12 11:15:14 mariadb-N1.intelligene.local systemd[1]: Failed to start MariaDB database server. -- Subject: Unit mariadb.service has failed -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-with-galera-on-redhat-72-not-starting/

1 0

[Maria-discuss] New Question: MariaDB Galera cluster gtid's falling out of sync inspite of setting wsrep_cluster
by AskMonty KB 11 Jun '16

11 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "MariaDB Community" by kk1674. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-galera-cluster-gtids-falling-out-of-sync-i… as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- I have asynchronous replication between 2 clusters (calling master cluster, slave cluster). As expected a node in the slave cluster receives async replication and galera transmits to the rest of the nodes of the slave cluster. When the gtid counter is being incremented on the nodes of this slave cluster, the node acting as the slave node is keeping track of master server id and incrementing the gtid by wsrep_domain_id, server_id, galera counter+1. However the other nodes of the slave cluster are not keeping track of the server id variable and increment gtid by wsrep_domain_id, galera counter+1. See below Slave node of the slave cluster show variables like '%gtid%'; +------------------------+-------------------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +------------------------+-------------------------+ | gtid_binlog_pos | 2-100-36261 | | gtid_binlog_state | 2-200-36263,2-100-36261 | | gtid_current_pos | 1-100-36261 | | gtid_domain_id | 22 | | gtid_ignore_duplicates | OFF | | gtid_seq_no | 0 | | gtid_slave_pos | 1-100-36261 | | gtid_strict_mode | OFF | | last_gtid | 2-200-36263 | | wsrep_gtid_domain_id | 2 | | wsrep_gtid_mode | ON | +------------------------+-------------------------+ 11 rows in set (0.00 sec) Another node in the slave cluster show variables like '%gtid%'; +------------------------+-------------------------+ | Variable_name | Value | +------------------------+-------------------------+ | gtid_binlog_pos | 2-100-36265 | | gtid_binlog_state | 2-200-36264,2-100-36265 | | gtid_current_pos | 1-100-36259 | | gtid_domain_id | 22 | | gtid_ignore_duplicates | OFF | | gtid_seq_no | 0 | | gtid_slave_pos | 1-100-36259 | | gtid_strict_mode | OFF | | last_gtid | | | wsrep_gtid_domain_id | 2 | | wsrep_gtid_mode | ON | +------------------------+-------------------------+ 11 rows in set (0.00 sec) This behavior has been noted in MariaDB 10.1.11, 10.1.13 and 10.1.14. In 10.1.11, gtid_slave_pos table is being replicated by galera hence if the slave node goes down it is possible to move the slave process to another node, by first setting the gtid_slave_pos variable. However starting 10.1.13 the table is not longer being replicated I see it as a fix for another issue agreeably, but now there is no means to determine the slave position to be able to start replication on another node of the cluster. Can this behavior be classified as bug and a bug request opened? -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-galera-cluster-gtids-falling-out-of-sync-i…

1 0

[Maria-discuss] New Question: MariaDB relocatable rpm packages
by AskMonty KB 10 Jun '16

10 Jun '16

Hello, A new question has been asked in "MariaDB FAQ" by palash.harchandani93_43595. Please answer it at http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-relocatable-rpm-packages/ as the person asking the question may not be subscribed to the mailing list. -------------------------------- I want to know if the mariadb 10.1.13 packages are relocatable or not as i want to install the rpm packages in some other directory rather than the default installation directory. -------------------------------- To view or answer this question please visit: http://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-relocatable-rpm-packages/

1 0