Hi Sergei! I was reading the patch, in messages inside lauchpad there's a benchmark showing a better performace with version 3.1 of jemalloc, but at mariadb 5.5 we are using 3.3 (if i'm not wrong) I know it's a fresh new release of mariadb, we need time to know if it's really better Any idea why we are using 3.3 instead 3.1, or maybe why not the last jemalloc version? Thanks :) 2013/9/18 Sergei Golubchik <serg@mariadb.org>
Hi, Reindl!
On Sep 18, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, recent is 3.4.0 however, the releas enotes are not really true jemalloc not linked nor loaded
https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-5533-release-notes/ Other Notable Information MariaDB is now built with jemalloc by default on Linux
[root@testserver:~]$ rpm -q --file /usr/libexec/mysqld mariadb-server-5.5.33-6.fc19.20130917.rh.x86_64
Where did you get it from? In the fedora19-update repo I only see mariadb-server-5.5.32.
Anyway, jemalloc is bundled with the mariadb sources and is linked in statically:
$ ldd sql/mysqld|grep jemalloc $ grep jemalloc sql/mysqld Binary file sql/mysqld matches $
Regards, Sergei
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial