Hi Sergei!
I was reading the patch, in messages inside lauchpad there's a benchmark showing a better performace with version 3.1 of jemalloc, but at mariadb 5.5 we are using 3.3 (if i'm not wrong)
I know it's a fresh new release of mariadb, we need time to know if it's really better
Any idea why we are using 3.3 instead 3.1, or maybe why not the last jemalloc version?
Thanks :)
Hi, Reindl!
Where did you get it from?
On Sep 18, Reindl Harald wrote:
> well, recent is 3.4.0
> however, the releas enotes are not really true
> jemalloc not linked nor loaded
>
> https://mariadb.com/kb/en/mariadb-5533-release-notes/
> Other Notable Information
> MariaDB is now built with jemalloc by default on Linux
>
> [root@testserver:~]$ rpm -q --file /usr/libexec/mysqld
> mariadb-server-5.5.33-6.fc19.20130917.rh.x86_64
In the fedora19-update repo I only see mariadb-server-5.5.32.
Anyway, jemalloc is bundled with the mariadb sources and is linked in
statically:
$ ldd sql/mysqld|grep jemalloc
$ grep jemalloc sql/mysqld
Binary file sql/mysqld matches
$
Regards,
Sergei
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp