Maybe you should consider testing 10.1 too Em domingo, 28 de dezembro de 2014, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> escreveu:
Am 28.12.2014 um 19:39 schrieb Federico Razzoli:
Yeah, well, I don't think that anyone in this world doesn't know/agree :)
That said, I recommend 10.0 because my 10.0 production servers didn't hit any bug (as far as I know), and optimize some queries better. Is your experience different from mine?
i am currently on 5.5 and 10.x is planned next year
but i have seen a major regression while switch from MySQl 5.5 to MariaDB 5.5 which had the power to damage emails received from dbmail servers with POP3 (IMAP as well, but a POP3 client don#t try to download a message again even if you fix the bug in the meantime) by wrong ordering of message parts
well, that makes me careful because 5.5. was a proposed drop-in-replacement
--------------------------------------------
Dom 28/12/14, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> ha scritto:
Oggetto: Re: [Maria-discuss] R: 5.5.x vs 10.x A: maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Data: Domenica 28 dicembre 2014, 19:00
Am 28.12.2014 um 18:17 schrieb Federico Razzoli:
10.0 is the newest stable release. So you should use it, unless you have a specific reason to prefer an older version.
in context of whatever software *that* is not a valid reason
if you manage 10, 20, 30 or more production servers and things are going down because unexpected regressions nobody will accept "but it is newest release" as excuse and expierience over many years shows repeatly that in doubt you can test over weeks and as soon you go in production and have real workload troubles never imagined may *or* may not start to happen
that said froma guy which is normally on-top if it comes to recent software versions, hence the expierience and thanks god most problems don't damage data irreversible
-- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial Eng. Automação e Controle