Maybe you should consider testing 10.1 too
Em domingo, 28 de dezembro de 2014, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> escreveu:
Am 28.12.2014 um 19:39 schrieb Federico Razzoli:
Yeah, well, I don't think that anyone in this world doesn't know/agree :)
That said, I recommend 10.0 because my 10.0 production servers didn't hit any bug (as far as I know), and optimize some queries better. Is your experience different from mine?
i am currently on 5.5 and 10.x is planned next year
but i have seen a major regression while switch from MySQl 5.5 to MariaDB 5.5 which had the power to damage emails received from dbmail servers with POP3 (IMAP as well, but a POP3 client don#t try to download a message again even if you fix the bug in the meantime) by wrong ordering of message parts
well, that makes me careful because 5.5. was a proposed drop-in-replacement
--------------------------------------------
Dom 28/12/14, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@thelounge.net> ha scritto:
Oggetto: Re: [Maria-discuss] R: 5.5.x vs 10.x
A: maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Data: Domenica 28 dicembre 2014, 19:00
Am
28.12.2014 um 18:17 schrieb Federico Razzoli:
> 10.0 is the newest stable release. So you
should use it, unless you have a specific reason to prefer
an older version.
in
context of whatever software *that* is not a valid reason
if you manage 10, 20, 30 or
more production servers and things are going
down because unexpected regressions nobody will
accept "but it is newest
release"
as excuse and expierience over many years shows repeatly
that
in doubt you can test over weeks and
as soon you go in production and
have real
workload troubles never imagined may *or* may not start to
happen
that said froma guy
which is normally on-top if it comes to recent
software versions, hence the expierience and
thanks god most problems
don't damage
data irreversible