nice :) no problem 2014-06-03 16:00 GMT-03:00 Sergei Golubchik <serg@mariadb.org>:
Hi, Roberto!
On Jun 03, Roberto Spadim wrote:
hi sergei, i think it's easy too maybe we could have some kind of servers, one for debug, one for production with instrumentations features and a clean server without intrumentations, just an idea, i think some time ago mysql was releasing mysql-dev, mysql-debug, mysql-xxx i'm wrong?
Yes, it was. And it was confusing and we had to explain all the time what MySQL-max was and how it was different from simply "MySQL". I wouldn't want to repeat this experience.
But in this particular case it is not necessary at all. As far as I understand, Pavel will compile his own binary anyway. The only issue is that MariaDB does not compile without performance schema at all. And it happens because we don't normally compile without performance schema, so when such a configuration breaks, we simply don't notice it.
But now I've reconfigured one of the builders in buildbot to compile MariaDB without performance schema. And we'll immediately notice when it won't compile, so in the future we can be sure that MariaDB can be built without performance schema. Even if we won't release binaries that were built that way.
Regards, Sergei
On Jun 03, Pavel Ivanov wrote:
I personally would prefer if MariaDB had performance schema not compiled in by default. Then we wouldn't be frustrated every time we upgrade and find out that the tarball doesn't compile without performance schema (yes, 10.0.11 doesn't compile).
This is easy to fix. I'll change one of our builders (that doesn't do release packages) to compile without performance schema.
-- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial Eng. Automação e Controle