On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:07 PM, Daniel Bartholomew <dbart@askmonty.org> wrote:
On 12/05/2010, at 9:12 PM, Paul McCullagh <paul.mccullagh@primebase.org> wrote:
Paul> You are free to copy any part of the primebase.org documentation Paul> to askmonty.org. Paul> Paul> It is not stated, but in general our documentation is also GPL. I Paul> will add this to our Web-site.
Paul,
Thank you for licensing the documentation under the GPL and letting us use it!
Hmm... this reminds me: We've decided to use a combo of GFDL and CC BY-SA for our documentation licenses. Copying in documentation that is GPL licensed is probably not possible, I'm sure the GPL is incompatible with at least CC BY-SA. I'm not even concerned of the PBXT docs, I'm sure Paul would be flexible. But I just realized we also use the MySQL help files, which surely are GPL and we haven't seen much signs of MySQL being active in relicensing their docs ;-) This raises the question whether we should actually use GPL only as the license for our manual? It is copyleft too, so a workable choice even if it is "awkward" for literary works. A key question would be how much will we lose (such as in man-days of effort) if we just take away the MySQL help files from the manual? henrik -- email: henrik.ingo@avoinelama.fi tel: +358-40-5697354 www: www.avoinelama.fi/~hingo book: www.openlife.cc