Hi Alessandro!
10.0.31 should be affected by https://jira.percona.com/browse/TDB-35 , do you think it could be related to your issue?
HTH,
Jocelyn Fournier Founder M : +33 6 51 21 54 10 https://www.softizy.com Softizy - At your side to Optimize your PHP / MySQL applications
Even if a change the order by and the query to include all 3 fields on the index, it still selects the PRIMARY key to query the table.
Do you think this is a bug?
Tks.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:34 AM, Alessandro Ren <dirty.ren@gmail.com> wrote:
Once cached, the query returns in 0s.
The force index solved the problem:MariaDB 10.0.31Force index:13 rows in set (2.31 sec)No force: 13 rows in set (12.97 sec)
MariDB 10.0.25:Force index: 13 rows in set (1.46 sec)No force: 13 rows in set (1.70 sec)
Explains per version follows:
10.0.25MariaDB [opperf]> show variables like '%version%';+-------------------------+------------------+ | Variable_name | Value |+-------------------------+------------------+ | innodb_version | 5.6.29-76.2 || protocol_version | 10 || slave_type_conversions | || tokudb_version | 5.6.26-74.0 || version | 10.0.25-MariaDB || version_comment | MariaDB Server || version_compile_machine | x86_64 || version_compile_os | Linux || version_malloc_library | bundled jemalloc |+-------------------------+------------------+ 9 rows in set (0.09 sec)
+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+------------ --------+---------+------+---- ---+-------------------------- --------------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+------------ --------+---------+------+---- ---+-------------------------- --------------------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | service_perf_651 | range | PRIMARY,service_perf_1_idx | service_perf_1_idx | 16 | NULL | 17880 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+------------ --------+---------+------+---- ---+-------------------------- --------------------+
10.0.31
MariaDB [opperf]> show variables like '%version%';+-------------------------+------------------+ | Variable_name | Value |+-------------------------+------------------+ | innodb_version | 5.6.36-82.0 || protocol_version | 10 || slave_type_conversions | || tokudb_version | 5.6.36-82.0 || version | 10.0.31-MariaDB || version_comment | MariaDB Server || version_compile_machine | x86_64 || version_compile_os | Linux || version_malloc_library | bundled jemalloc |+-------------------------+------------------+ 9 rows in set (0.11 sec)
+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+ | 1 | SIMPLE | service_perf_651 | range | PRIMARY,service_perf_1_idx | PRIMARY | 16 | NULL | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+
tks.
On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Reinis Rozitis <r@roze.lv> wrote:
MariaDB 10.0.25 - 13 rows in set (1.67 sec)
MariaDB 10.0.31 - 13 rows in set (29.06 sec)
+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+
| id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | key_len | ref | rows | Extra |
+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+
| 1 | SIMPLE | service_perf_651 | range | PRIMARY,service_perf_1_idx | PRIMARY | 16 | NULL | 1 | Using where; Using temporary; Using filesort |
+------+-------------+------------------+-------+----------- -----------------+---------+-- -------+------+------+-------- ------------------------------ --------+
This is typical when the MySQL query optimiser decides that it will be faster to use an index for sorting rather than selecting.
Sometimes the query plans change because of versions or table/index statistics.
For testing purposes you can try to drop the "order by entry_time" part or add FORCE INDEX:
SELECT ... from service_perf_651 FORCE INDEX(service_perf_1_idx) WHERE ...
rr
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp