Hi Frederico, You identify three problems. 1. Developers are mostly ignorant of dynamic column or that they can solve this problem. I agree. 2. Maria's interface is not easy. I agree but my opinion has changed during this discussion. There's a limit to what the server can do about this. Also, the CRUD app developer is unlikely to be writing SQL. So I think we need to look farther up the stack for the solution(s). 3. No indexes. I partly agree. On one hand, if you really want to sell the feature to the broad user community then yes, this is an obvious hole in your marketing story. But the feature is still very useful without it. Many applications will function fine without indexes. The general problem (a type with too many properties) is old and has been solved in the past without indexes. Dynamic columns are a big step forwards even without the indexes. The way I see it now, we are complaining to the wrong people. We have to do some work on the client side (where exactly, I'm not sure) and we need better marketing. Tom On 1/29/15, 2:56 AM, "Federico Razzoli" <federico_raz@yahoo.it> wrote:
Hi
I agree that EAV is a pain in the ass. Having several very similar tables that represent flavors of the same "parent entity" is a pain too. Dynamic Columns are logically simple.
I think that the problem is that people don't really know them. And if one tries to explore them, he finds a syntax that is not really easy. Also they are slow, unless you index them, but indexing a dynamic column is not easy - also, requires more space than a normal index, because you are supposed to create a persistent column first.
I don't have any suggestions, except that importing data from JSON would be easier and probably useful (something like a JSON_TO_DYNCOL function).
Regards Federico
-------------------------------------------- Gio 29/1/15, Adam Scott <adam.c.scott@gmail.com> ha scritto:
Oggetto: Re: [Maria-discuss] The future of Dynamic Columns A: "Oleksandr Byelkin" <sanja@montyprogram.com> Cc: "Maria Discuss" <maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net> Data: Giovedì 29 gennaio 2015, 02:20
Just wanted to add, any application that wants to store forms data without having to create a new table every time you create a new form could benefit from dynamic columns.
In the database design world, any design that is of the EAV (Entity-Attribute-Value) style would benefit from dynamic columns. Having to extract and analyze EAV tables, for the developer, is tricky and burdensome. This model seems to show up in the literature first in Medical settings and is used in basic science research as well. (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entity%E2%80%93attribute%E2%80%93value_model)
For those that need it, dynamic columns is powerful and makes life much easier. Unfortunately, often those that need dynamic columns do not know it exists. If they did, they would jump for joy.
Adam
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@montyprogram.com> wrote: Hi, Tom!
On 28.01.15 23:01, Tom Worster wrote:
While functions for getting and setting via json might be useful, I think they are peripheral to the core datatype problem here.
The interface to dynamic columns in Maria is SQL. The internal datatypes are SQLish. We can be completely sure of what was set, in SQL terms, by a COLUMN_CREATE(). But if we use a JSON getter then we might get something different because JSON datatypes don't match SQL datatypes. Sometimes it's no problem but not in general -- depends on the datatypes involved and the application's tolerance of differences.
AFAIK we lack only boolean type and arrays (could be emulated now but you can't say if it is array or object with numeric keys) to fit json types.
column_create/alter do not require type (detect automatically), so type there can be mentioned to enforce some encoding you want (store dates as dates but not string)
column_get() require type of output, if you do not care use CHAR. But this is required by SQL expression implementation. There is json output which do not need type of columns.
What's missing is a getter that tells us the value and datatype of a dynamic column, a getter that tells us what was set.
What if we had a getter that returns a string like:
COLUMN_GET_SQL(`product`, 'price')
"CAST(123.456 AS DECIMAL(11,3))"
And Maria promises us that we could use that expression to write the value back and the result will be the exact same thing. A sort of idempotency promise (kinda).
This doesn't make the interface any less clunky (on the contrary) but I have resigned myself to a clunky interface. The only alternative is to forget all this and start something different. SQL is an insanely clunky old language and that's why we use some kind of abstraction software to make it nicer. If we're going to use SQL we may as well try to use what's there.
Something like this COLUMN_GET_SQL() would at least allow the application the possibility to get back what it put in.
I am not sure that I understand what you need. Is it ability to know internal storage type?
[skip]
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
-----Segue allegato-----
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss Post to : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp