hi,all

I also came into the almost same situation, my migration like below:

1. use xtrabackup back a mysql5.5.x database
2. set up the first node of PXC5.6 with the backup
3. start the master-slave replication between mysql5.5 and the first node of pxc5.6
4. add new node to the PXC5.6

when i process the step 4, I found the replication is stopped caused by the auto-increment issue.
And i found the binlog-format of mysql5.5.x is statement-based, So i setup a middle node with row
based binlog as the master of PXC, and it works. the operation steps like below:
1. use xtrabackup back a mysql5.5.x database
2. setup a middle node mysql5.6.x with the backup and binlog-format=row
3. start the master-slave replication between mysql5.5 and mysql5.6.x
4. set up the first node of PXC5.6 with the backup
5. start the master-slave replication between mysql5.6.x and the first node of pxc5.6
6. add new node to the PXC5.6

I do not deep into find the reason, but i know there must be something different for pxc and normal slave
at the method of handling auto-increment field,So with row-based binlog, there is no need to handle the
auto-increment field values, and the behaviour of them will be the same.


On Sep 6, 2014, at 8:00, Daniel Black <daniel.black@openquery.com> wrote:



----- Original Message -----

Hmm, maybe an idea by myself on the cause:

the initial sync to galera was done as followed:

- dump on the (locked) master
- inserted the dumps on a galera node
- started replication (change master to...) with the saved state of the
master

I've read somewhere that galera handles the auto_increments with a
offset for each node (by design) - so you cannot rely on it.

This should only matter if you are writing directly to the galera nodes.

It can be disabled however.
http://galeracluster.com/documentation-webpages/mysqlwsrepoptions.html#wsrep-auto-increment-control

That is no
problem for the application at all. But as i use ROW based replication
the autoincrements (created on the master) could exist on the galera
side already, right?

Did you compare the contents of the row on master and galera?

what would be a way to avoid it? i think i need another migration
scenario...

It looks quite sane to me.

-- 
-- 
Daniel Black, Engineer @ Open Query (http://openquery.com.au)
Remote expertise & maintenance for MySQL/MariaDB server environments.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to     : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp