-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 16.02.2012 09:55, Walter Heck wrote:
I think it would be fair to take into account both the things Colin and Stewart have said as many of them are correct, but their words should also be taken with a grain of salt as they work for the companies that would benefit heavily from having 'their' fork be the replacement of mysql. That's not to accuse them of anything, just to keep in mind when making a decision. The fork that 'wins' this decision might well be the more succesful one in the long run simply because of being the default mysql version in two of the most widely used linux distributions.
well spoken. At some point I also guess that "our" descission may even influence the other two major's: SuSE and DeadRed? B -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk88xZAACgkQABMWRpwdNul//QCg0Iw4xdpLMed97c7EXcyyQYX3 JCsAn2nnEuQybUafR8air58qF84/4D34 =fHwe -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----