On Feb 16, 2015 2:02 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@thelounge.net> wrote:

Am 16.02.2015 um 22:53 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov:

Thank you Reindl.

So basically what that means is that mariadb is not 100% compatable with
percona and  mysql?

define 100% - replication is a *binary log*

if it would be identical in every aspect it would exist only one product and even if all docs pretend 100% compatibility i would never come to the idea even run different minor versions in a replication setup

just follow these instructions leads to the conclusion mix different products is a bad idea: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.0/en/replication-upgrade.html

P.S.: i don't appreciate off-list replies

On Feb 16, 2015 1:23 PM, "Reindl Harald" <h.reindl@thelounge.net
<mailto:h.reindl@thelounge.net>> wrote:



    Am 16.02.2015 um 22:19 schrieb Vadim Pestovnikov:

        Error in Log_event::read_log_event(): 'Found invalid event in binary
        log', data_len: 44, event_type: 33

        Error reading relay log event: slave SQL thread aborted because
        of I/O error

        My slave is MariaDB 10 with data and logs partitions encrypted
        by LUKS
        and with SSL enabled. As far as RDS and Percona servers don't
        use SSL I
        am using non SSL user for the replication.

        Any recommendations or suggestions would be extremely appreciated


    don't mix different server versions in replication setups

    there is a good reason why it is recommended always to update first
    the slaves, run "mysql_upgrade" and then the masters to be 100% sure
    that the maste rnever don't write anything into the binlog the slave
    won't understand because differences in details

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
Post to     : maria-discuss@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-discuss
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp