[Maria-developers] WL#130 New (by Knielsen): Good defaults for ./configure (for end-user source builds)
----------------------------------------------------------------------- WORKLOG TASK -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TASK...........: Good defaults for ./configure (for end-user source builds) CREATION DATE..: Thu, 19 Aug 2010, 10:09 SUPERVISOR.....: IMPLEMENTOR....: COPIES TO......: CATEGORY.......: Server-RawIdeaBin TASK ID........: 130 (http://askmonty.org/worklog/?tid=130) VERSION........: Server-9.x STATUS.........: Un-Assigned PRIORITY.......: 60 WORKED HOURS...: 0 ESTIMATE.......: 0 (hours remain) ORIG. ESTIMATE.: 0 PROGRESS NOTES: DESCRIPTION: I would really like it to be easy to build MariaDB from source. Basically, a plain ./configure should just work in the normal case, and produce something sensible that is close/identical to what a relase build looks like. Unfortunately, this is not currently so. There is a long tradition in MySQL (and now MariaDB) that release builds are made with a long carefully crafted list of ./configure options that are necessary to get everything included or enabled. One concrete example I found is that plain ./configure will build XtraDB/InnoDB as plugins by default. This means that upon starting the server, there will be no engine "innodb" available until one is installed with INSTALL PLUGIN! I think this is not desirable default behaviour. The task here is to go through the ourdelta build scripts [1] and check all the ./configure options we use in them and what the default behaviour of that option is. Defaults that is not sensible for a plain ./configure build should be changed. References: [1] http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/ourdelta/ourdelta-montyprogram-f... ESTIMATED WORK TIME ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- WorkLog (v4.0.0)
participants (1)
-
worklog-noreply@askmonty.org