On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:48:10PM +0530, Varun wrote:

revision-id: 167a96b5157049408a6ad4bca7abcd376af93fb5 (mariadb-10.3.0-644-g167a96b5157) parent(s): 4359c6b4806605c78987e50cab3a6b42016b7603 author: Varun Gupta committer: Varun Gupta timestamp: 2018-03-27 16:45:46 +0530 message:

MDEV-9959: A serious MariaDB server performance bug

step#1: if a derived table has SELECT DISTINCT, provide index statistics for it so that the join optimizer in the upper select knows that ref access to the table will produce one row.

Added handling for multiple selects in the derived table

...

diff --git a/mysql-test/r/mdev9959.result b/mysql-test/r/mdev9959.result new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..049e0350cca --- /dev/null +++ b/mysql-test/r/mdev9959.result @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@ +create table t1(a int); +insert into t1 values (1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6); +create table t2(a int, b int,c int); +insert into t2(a,b,c) values (1,1,2),(2,2,3),(3,1,4),(4,2,2),(5,1,1),(6,2,5); +create table t3(a int, b int); +insert into t3(a,b) values (1,1),(2,2),(2,1),(1,2),(5,1),(9,2); +table "<derived2>" should have type=ref and rows=1 +one select in derived table +with distinct +analyze select * from t1 , ((select distinct t2.a from t2 order by c))q where t1.a=q.a; +id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows r_rows filtered r_filtered Extra +1 PRIMARY t1 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 6.00 100.00 100.00 Using where +1 PRIMARY <derived2> ref key0 key0 5 test.t1.a 1 1.00 100.00 100.00 +2 DERIVED t2 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 6.00 100.00 100.00 Using temporary; Using filesort +# multiple selects in derived table +# NO UNION ALL +analyze select * from t1 , ( (select t2.a,t2.b from t2 order by c) union (select t2.a,t2.b from t2 order by c))q where t1.a=q.a; +id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows r_rows filtered r_filtered Extra +1 PRIMARY t1 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 6.00 100.00 100.00 Using where +1 PRIMARY <derived2> ref key0 key0 5 test.t1.a 1 1.00 100.00 100.00 +2 DERIVED t2 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 6.00 100.00 100.00 +3 UNION t2 ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6 6.00 100.00 100.00 +NULL UNION RESULT ALL NULL NULL NULL NULL NULL 6.00 NULL NULL

How would you explain the above? The derived table is a union of two selects, each of which produces 6 rows. Neither of the selects have DISTINCT attribute. Why does the optimization fire and set ref=1 in this case? (if both parts of UNION had distinct, this would make sense. But if neither does, I don't see any logic) BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer MariaDB Corporation | Skype: sergefp | Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog