[Maria-developers] MariaDB 5.1.51
All, I've created the download, release notes, and changelog pages for MariaDB 5.1.51: http://askmonty.org/wiki/MariaDB:Download:MariaDB_5.1.51 http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-release-notes http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-changelog Apart from the CentOS packages, the mirrors should now have all of the files for this release. There was an issue with the signing key used on the CentOS packages. The issue has been fixed and the updated packages are seeding now. If you can't wait, the osuosl.org mirror is the primary one and is always up-to-date. Please let me know if anything is missing from the release notes or changelog, or if there are any errors. If you have editing rights, feel free to make the corrections or additions directly; otherwise, please let me know of needed changes here or on IRC. Thanks. -- Daniel Bartholomew MariaDB - http://mariadb.org Monty Program - http://montyprogram.com AskMonty Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org
On 11/19/2010 08:17 AM, Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
All,
I've created the download, release notes, and changelog pages for MariaDB 5.1.51:
http://askmonty.org/wiki/MariaDB:Download:MariaDB_5.1.51 http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-release-notes http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-changelog
Apart from the CentOS packages, the mirrors should now have all of the files for this release. There was an issue with the signing key used on the CentOS packages. The issue has been fixed and the updated packages are seeding now. If you can't wait, the osuosl.org mirror is the primary one and is always up-to-date.
Please let me know if anything is missing from the release notes or changelog, or if there are any errors. If you have editing rights, feel free to make the corrections or additions directly; otherwise, please let me know of needed changes here or on IRC.
Thanks.
* MySQL Bug #51242 <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=51242> /HAVING clause on table join produce incorrect results/ Daniel, this 'fix' was reverted in MariaDB 5.1.48. Then Monty mistakenly pulled in when merging. A month ago I removed it again in 5.1. How has it come that it's there? Is it there? The same is applied to * MySQL Bug #39653 <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=39653> /find_shortest_key in sql_select.cc does not consider clustered primary keys:/ We did not accept the patch in 5.1.48. Did we provide a different patch? How did you get the list of bugs in http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-release-notes after all?
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:04:17 -0800 Igor Babaev <igor@askmonty.org> wrote: Igor> * MySQL Bug #51242 Igor> <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=51242> /HAVING clause on table Igor> join produce incorrect results/ Igor> Igor> Daniel, Igor> Igor> this 'fix' was reverted in MariaDB 5.1.48. Igor> Then Monty mistakenly pulled in when merging. A month ago I Igor> removed it again in 5.1. Igor> How has it come that it's there? Is it there? Igor> Igor> The same is applied to Igor> Igor> * MySQL Bug #39653 <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=39653> Igor> /find_shortest_key in sql_select.cc does not consider Igor> clustered primary keys:/ Igor> Igor> We did not accept the patch in 5.1.48. Did we provide a different Igor> patch? Igor> Igor> How did you get the list of bugs in Igor> http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-release-notes after all? The list of bugs was gatherered from the bugs mentioned in the Changelog: http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-changelog The changelog is basically a list of the commit messages between 5.1.50 and 5.1.51. For mybug#51242 you are correct that the fix for this bug was reverted: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1/revision/2952 I've removed 51242 from the list on the release notes. For mybug#39653, the commit message says that a fix was applied for it: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1/revision/2958 ... but maybe I'm misreading the commit message. Should I remove it from the list of fixed bugs? Thanks! -- Daniel Bartholomew MariaDB - http://mariadb.org Monty Program - http://montyprogram.com AskMonty Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org
Daniel Bartholomew wrote:
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:04:17 -0800 Igor Babaev <igor@askmonty.org> wrote:
Igor> * MySQL Bug #51242 Igor> <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=51242> /HAVING clause on table Igor> join produce incorrect results/ Igor> Igor> Daniel, Igor> Igor> this 'fix' was reverted in MariaDB 5.1.48. Igor> Then Monty mistakenly pulled in when merging. A month ago I Igor> removed it again in 5.1. Igor> How has it come that it's there? Is it there? Igor> Igor> The same is applied to Igor> Igor> * MySQL Bug #39653 <http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=39653> Igor> /find_shortest_key in sql_select.cc does not consider Igor> clustered primary keys:/ Igor> Igor> We did not accept the patch in 5.1.48. Did we provide a different Igor> patch? Igor> Igor> How did you get the list of bugs in Igor> http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-release-notes after all?
The list of bugs was gatherered from the bugs mentioned in the Changelog: http://kb.askmonty.org/v/mariadb-5151-changelog
The changelog is basically a list of the commit messages between 5.1.50 and 5.1.51.
For mybug#51242 you are correct that the fix for this bug was reverted: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1/revision/2952 I've removed 51242 from the list on the release notes.
For mybug#39653, the commit message says that a fix was applied for it: http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~maria-captains/maria/5.1/revision/2958 ... but maybe I'm misreading the commit message. Should I remove it from the list of fixed bugs?
It seems to me that SergeiG pushed his own fix for this bug which has nothing to do with mysql patch. And this is important since Facebook guys screamed exactly about the mysql fix of this bug. Meanwhile we do not provide a link to our patch. Rather we give a reference to their patch. I'm afraid people will be confused. This is true for others of our fixes that differ from those pushed into the mysql code base. Regards, Igor.
Thanks!
participants (2)
-
Daniel Bartholomew -
Igor Babaev