Hello Marko! On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Marko Mäkelä wrote:

Hi Aleksey,

I think that we should remove trx_t::start_time, and always use trx_t::start_time_micro.

If that will be the case, then start_time_micro must be the absolute time, not the relative one like it is now. -- All the best, Aleksey Midenkov @midenok

I shortly discussed this with Vladislav Vaintroub, and he mentioned that the microsecond timestamp in THD::start_utime is updated at the start of each statement. I also looked at his MDEV-12345 performance fix. It looks like trx_start_low() is already doing the right thing, except that the trx_t::start_time should be removed.

I'd welcome a contributed patch that removes trx_t:.start_time. Or if that really is too tricky, convert start_time_micro to start_time.

Marko

On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:

...

Hello!

Different semantics of these 2 members doesn't look good:

time_t start_time; /*!< time the state last time became TRX_STATE_ACTIVE */ ib_uint64_t start_time_micro; /*!< start time of transaction in microseconds */

Either `start_time_micro` should be drawn to the base of `start_time` or it should be explicitly commented that it has nothing to do with `start_time`. I.e. there is nothing wrong on algorithmic level, but such data members may (and certainly would) lead developers to misuse of `start_time_micro`.

-- All the best,

Aleksey Midenkov @midenok

_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

-- Marko Mäkelä, Lead Developer InnoDB MariaDB Corporation

DON’T MISS

M|18

MariaDB User Conference

February 26 - 27, 2018

New York City

https://m18.mariadb.com/