----------------------------------------------------------------------- WORKLOG TASK -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- TASK...........: subquery optimizations: Use cache for correlated non-semijoin subqueries (superseded by MWL#66) CREATION DATE..: Mon, 11 May 2009, 19:03 SUPERVISOR.....: Monty IMPLEMENTOR....: COPIES TO......: CATEGORY.......: Server-RawIdeaBin TASK ID........: 18 (http://askmonty.org/worklog/?tid=18) VERSION........: Server-9.x STATUS.........: Cancelled PRIORITY.......: 60 WORKED HOURS...: 0 ESTIMATE.......: 0 (hours remain) ORIG. ESTIMATE.: 0 PROGRESS NOTES: -=-=(Psergey - Mon, 11 Jan 2010, 13:23)=-=- Title modified. --- /tmp/wklog.18.old.24804 2010-01-11 13:23:04.000000000 +0200 +++ /tmp/wklog.18.new.24804 2010-01-11 13:23:04.000000000 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -subquery optimizations: Use cache for correlated non-semijoin subqueries +subquery optimizations: Use cache for correlated non-semijoin subqueries (superseded by MWL#66) -=-=(Psergey - Mon, 11 Jan 2010, 13:22)=-=- High Level Description modified. --- /tmp/wklog.18.old.24759 2010-01-11 11:22:35.000000000 +0000 +++ /tmp/wklog.18.new.24759 2010-01-11 11:22:35.000000000 +0000 @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +(( This WL entry is superseded by MWL#66 )) + Suppose there is a subquery that is correlated, and is not in the WHERE clause e.g. -=-=(Guest - Mon, 11 Jan 2010, 13:21)=-=- Status updated. --- /tmp/wklog.18.old.24677 2010-01-11 13:21:24.000000000 +0200 +++ /tmp/wklog.18.new.24677 2010-01-11 13:21:24.000000000 +0200 @@ -1 +1 @@ -Un-Assigned +Cancelled -=-=(Psergey - Mon, 11 May 2009, 19:05)=-=- High-Level Specification modified. --- /tmp/wklog.18.old.1385 2009-05-11 19:05:55.000000000 +0300 +++ /tmp/wklog.18.new.1385 2009-05-11 19:05:55.000000000 +0300 @@ -1 +1,12 @@ +Not a spec but some considerations: +* eq_ref access has one-element "lookup cache" + +* Materialization optimization (WL#1110) also has lookup cache, see +subselect_hash_semi_join_engine::test_if_l_operand_changed. + +The tricky parts are: + +1. Assemble a list of correlation references + +2. Determine cache size. DESCRIPTION: (( This WL entry is superseded by MWL#66 )) Suppose there is a subquery that is correlated, and is not in the WHERE clause e.g. SELECT ..., (SELECT ... FROM t2 WHERE t2.col=t1.col) FROM t1; or SELECT ..., left_expr IN (SELECT ... FROM t2 WHERE t2.col=t1.col) FROM t1; In this case, the only strategy is to re-evaluate the predicate for every record combination of the outer select. This can be improved if we catch all correlation references and implement a lookup cache: (left_expr, outer_ref_value1, ... outer_ref_valueN) -> predicate_value it's hard to predict what will be the optimal size of the cache but one-element cache will most certainly be worth it. HIGH-LEVEL SPECIFICATION: Not a spec but some considerations: * eq_ref access has one-element "lookup cache" * Materialization optimization (WL#1110) also has lookup cache, see subselect_hash_semi_join_engine::test_if_l_operand_changed. The tricky parts are: 1. Assemble a list of correlation references 2. Determine cache size. ESTIMATED WORK TIME ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE ----------------------------------------------------------------------- WorkLog (v3.5.9)