On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:17:08 +0300, "Oleksandr \"Sanja\" Byelkin" <sanja@askmonty.org> wrote: <cut> Oleksandr> I see one problem with Wiki-like markups - they are not Oleksandr> designed to get result as hard copy (book/brochure) IMHO it Oleksandr> is big disadvantage, some people like to read something Oleksandr> material or at least PDF :) The reason I like creole markup is because it is easy to pick up and lowers the barriers to entry for potential contributors. The other reason for liking creole (and why we will not be using a wiki platform like mediawiki for our online docs) is that we can take one of the existing creole parsers (or write our own) and embed it into anything we want. Creole is not a wiki, it is simply an easy-to-use markup language which several wikis use. We aren't yet at a stage where we've even begun to make plans for what to do on the subject of printed documentation. However, after putting on my speculation hat, I can say this: creole markup has a logical structure, and it is possible to create something which translates creole-formatted documents into something which eventually results in a pdf suitable for printing. -- Daniel Bartholomew