Andrei, thanks for explanation!

Agree with you and Sergei on that topic.

Sergei,

On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 9:04 PM Sergei Golubchik <serg@mariadb.org> wrote:
Hi, Aleksey!

On Mar 12, Aleksey Midenkov wrote:
> Hi, Sergei,
>
> Thank you for observations! This task is in progress. While doing it I
> found out that RBR doesn't replicate timestamp fractions. That is: it
> gets seconds from event timestamp marker and adds fractions from
> system time.  This causes bugs in System Versioning. More on it in Bug
> 6 here:
> https://github.com/tempesta-tech/mariadb/issues/578#issuecomment-470533050
>
> I propose to fix it by adding timestamp fractions field to Log_event
> header after FLAGS_OFFSET. To support backwards compatibility it is
> needed to increment fdle->binlog_version and probably add new flag
> LOG_EVENT_HAS_SEC_PART_F (for support sending Log_event without
> fractions).
> Do you agree?

Query_log_event() can already store microseconds, see Q_HRNOW flag.
So better to add them to Rows_log_event, if needed.

But I don't quite understand why it's needed.

In scope of MDEV-16370 slave adds history record. Master sends UPDATE of row
(row_start = X.Y; row_end = MAX). Query time is X.(Y + n).

Slave adds history record and gets timestamp: X from master; F from system time fractions.
If F < Y this makes bad history record (row_start = X.Y; row_end = X.F). 
 

What you see - microseconds from the system time and seconds from the
binlog event - is a workaround for replicating non-versioned master to
versioned slave, where binlog events don't have microseconds.

In your case versioned-to-versioned RBR, row events should have
microsecond-exact timestamps already, you can get them from there.

Only Delete_rows_log_event might not have the actual timestamp(6),
but this can be fixed on the master, I suspect.

Regards,
Sergei
Chief Architect MariaDB
and security@mariadb.org


--
All the best,

Aleksey Midenkov
@midenok