21 Sep
2009
21 Sep
'09
9:36 p.m.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org> wrote:
Henrik Ingo <henrik.ingo@avoinelama.fi> writes:
I'm the wrong person to answer, but seems to me we should at this
Just wanted to leave that quote :-) I re-read your original text and offer some other non-expert thoughts... Where else would @@TIMESTAMP be modified? Can a user do that from SQL? (If so, why???) If replication is the only reason for concern, then yes, Seconds_behind_master is what I was always using. henrik -- email: henrik.ingo@avoinelama.fi tel: +358-40-5697354 www: www.avoinelama.fi/~hingo book: www.openlife.cc