Oleksandr Byelkin <sanja@askmonty.org> writes:
27.10.2011 15:29, Kristian Nielsen пишет:
Oleksandr Byelkin<sanja@askmonty.org> writes:
26.10.2011 22:18, Michael Widenius пишет: [skip]
=== modified file 'storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc' --- a/storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc 2010-09-28 13:05:45 +0000 +++ b/storage/pbxt/src/thread_xt.cc 2011-10-25 14:24:24 +0000 @@ -485,7 +485,8 @@ static void thr_free_resources(XTThreadP
xtPublic void xt_bug(XTThreadPtr XT_UNUSED(self)) { - static int *bug_ptr = NULL; + static int *bug_ptr __attribute__ ((unused)); + bug_ptr= NULL;
bug_ptr = NULL; } Th code was super strange before, I left it strange :) I think it is better to Percona to decide what to do with it (I sent them patch for 5.3). Did you really send to Percona, or did you mean PBXT? Either way, PBXT it should be :) Actually I sent whole patch to percona hoping they will take part they want.
About pbxt - I was informed that nobody care about it, so did not do special movement... In any case the patch is published and code was preserved as it was :)
Ok, I misunderstood then. I thought you meant that you sent the above patch to thread_xt.cc to Percona, I just wanted to point out that this is PBXT code, not Percona code. Sorry for any confusion. - Kristian.