31 Mar
2014
31 Mar
'14
5:34 a.m.
Hi, Sergey! On Mar 27, Sergey Petrunia wrote:
Hello,
I was looking at whether column names used by EIS feature are consistent with themselves and with ther parts of the server. ... What's your opinion, should we make some renames to make things more consistent?
I don't think it matters much - these column names are internal that don't affect anything. I have a very slight preference towards database_name, histogram_size, and histogram_type column names. There is no reason to save on characters here, I'd rather follow a "don't abbrev" rule. But I hope that all the code uses column numbers/positions and never column names, right? That is, no matter how you call your columns, EIS will continue to work. Regards, Sergei