i think follow_master_commits is better than follow_commits (and better than following_master) /Jonas On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Kristian Nielsen <knielsen@knielsen-hq.org
wrote:
Pavel Ivanov <pivanof@google.com> writes:
I'd say "following_master" will be very confusing, because degree of parallelization on slave won't match degree of parallelization on master in this case. Just because some commits are in different commit
Right, that was my original concern as well. With two of us, there will probably be other users who would find it confusing.
and that will take much more time combined. So it can be hardly called "following master". "follow_commits" could be more appropriate.
Maybe "follow_master_commits", as Serg suggested? Not _too_ long, and seems to better describe what is going on.
Thanks,
- Kristian.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp