![](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/185f2fe297ad778d428de9b93e6005e9.jpg?s=120&d=mm&r=g)
Hi, Hello, 25.06.2019 15:52, Michal Schorm пише:
Hello,
I am a Fedora packager and I'd like to make myself sure on some assumptions I made. Just to make sure in the following conversation: * I understand "Connector C 3.1.2" as "major version number . minor version number . release number (or sometimes refered as patch number)". * In Fedora we use dynamic libraries and dynamic linking whenever possible. We are building the CONC/ODBC on top of CONC/C.
1) ABI & API compatibility I assume, the major versions are fully API & ABI (backward) compatible. That means to me it is safe to upgrade to later versions of the same major version number when using end-user application. There's no need to rebuild the end-user app.
"The MariaDB Connector/ODBC 3.1 series is built on top of MariaDB Connector/C 3.x" That means to me I can build the CONC/ODBC 3.1 on top of CONC/C 3.0 and there's no need for rebuild, when I upgrade to the CONC/C 3.1. Thus it is safe to upgrade withing one major version without any threat.
Exactly. Btw, first C/ODBC releases used 3.0 only because C/C 3.1 wasn't GA to the moment. The next 3.1 release will already be using.
That means to me I can update the package in Fedora mid release. During a lifetime of a Fedora release (let's say Fedora 30), I only update packages which won't break ABI & API compatibility. If there would be potential risk, I would push that update only to the next Fedora release (developement branch - Fedora Rawhide). That's what I do e.g. with minor versions of MariaDB server. I won't update the 10.3 to 10.4 in the lifetime of one release, but prepare the 10.4 to the next release. (Fedora Rawhide)
Am I right with above assumptions? Can I safely upgrade within one major version of the C and ODBC connectors and don't need rebuild of the dependant packages and end-user apps? If not, why was CONC/ODBC 3.0 discontinued and hidden?
Should be always safe with ODBC. With C/C everything is possible, and that is basically why 2.3 is still maintained. But 3.0 is discontinues since we believe 3.1 is complete and safe replacement for it.
2) Version upgrade Is there any reason to use other than latest GA release of those connectors? (e.g. to use CONC/C 3.0 series instead of 3.1 series) Perhaps when using against different MariaDB server major versions?
No. And again - that is why 3.0 is discontinued.
I assume there is not. If there is, again - why was CONC/ODBC 3.0 discontinued and hidden?
Looks like all your assumptions were correct. Best regards, Lawrin
--
Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat
--
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers Post to : maria-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp