- developers - lists.mariadb.org

Re: [Maria-developers] 331034cb6e1: MDEV-11975: SQLCOM_PREPARE of EXPLAIN & ANALYZE statement do not return correct metadata info
by Sergei Golubchik 25 Apr '18

25 Apr '18

Hi, Oleksandr! On Apr 20, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote: > revision-id: 331034cb6e1552e1ab7c12b6f7341f557f76b807 (mariadb-10.3.6-16-g331034cb6e1) > parent(s): cff60be7fe159fdcb2517ce8441610ad512aa7d0 > author: Oleksandr Byelkin > committer: Oleksandr Byelkin > timestamp: 2018-04-20 14:40:14 +0200 > message: > > MDEV-11975: SQLCOM_PREPARE of EXPLAIN & ANALYZE statement do not return correct metadata info > > Added metadate info after prepare EXPLAIN/ANALYZE. > > diff --git a/sql/sql_class.cc b/sql/sql_class.cc > index 96485ed15ec..0ec95e11829 100644 > --- a/sql/sql_class.cc > +++ b/sql/sql_class.cc > @@ -2659,18 +2659,32 @@ CHANGED_TABLE_LIST* THD::changed_table_dup(const char *key, size_t key_length) > } > > > -int THD::send_explain_fields(select_result *result, uint8 explain_flags, bool is_analyze) > +void THD::prepare_explain_fields(select_result *result, > + List<Item> *field_list, > + uint8 explain_flags, > + bool is_analyze) > { > - List<Item> field_list; > + ; forgot to remove? otherwise, ok to push... Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] MDEV-13695: INTERSECT precedence is not in line with Oracle even in SQL_MODE=Oracle
by Sergei Golubchik 25 Apr '18

25 Apr '18

Hi, Oleksandr! On Apr 24, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote: > revision-id: cb6aade130b75f3dc4b7c3a1dd4d33864adffd90 (mariadb-10.3.6-43-gcb6aade130b) > parent(s): f79c5a658cc33a10d7744a748a4328254e2cbaf7 > author: Oleksandr Byelkin > committer: Oleksandr Byelkin > timestamp: 2018-04-24 12:04:59 +0200 > message: > > MDEV-13695: INTERSECT precedence is not in line with Oracle even in SQL_MODE=Oracle > > Switch off automatic INTERSECT priority for ORACLE MODE ok to push Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0

[Maria-developers] 10.3-MDEV-11953
by Alexander Barkov 25 Apr '18

25 Apr '18

Hello Igor and Sanja, In your branch you stopped to use the global function check_simple_select(). It's not used any more. Please remove it from sql_parse.h and sql_parse.cc. Thanks.

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] 57673bc: MDEV-14024 PCRE2
by Sergei Golubchik 24 Apr '18

24 Apr '18

Hi, Alexey! On Apr 24, Alexey Botchkov wrote: > > But for mroonga you've just changed the include path. I was > > surprised that it was enough. Perhaps mroonga doesn't use pcre at > > all? > > No, mroonga doesn't use PCRE, just mentions in comfigure scripts. > As far as i can see. At least it compiles fine with my changes. If it doesn't use PCRE, could you remove those lines with the path at all? Would be less confusing. Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] 57673bc: MDEV-14024 PCRE2
by Sergei Golubchik 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hi, Alexey! On Apr 23, Alexey Botchkov wrote: > > >> diff --git a/sql/item_cmpfunc.h b/sql/item_cmpfunc.h > >> index 3d11a22..d3f52ed 100644 > >... > >> #define PCRE_STATIC 1 /* Important on Windows */ > >> -#include "pcre.h" /* pcre header file */ > >> +#define PCRE2_CODE_UNIT_WIDTH 8 > > > >you sure, you want it here and not, say, in one universally-included > >headers like my_config.h? You don't define it in other places now, so > >they include different function names and macros. > > Since it's the only place where we include the 'pcre2.h', it probably > makes sence to keep all pcre2-related stuff in one place. No, that was precisely my point - you included pcre2.h in many (more than one) files, but defined PCRE2_CODE_UNIT_WIDTH only here. Otherwise I wouldn't have asked :) > Still i moved the #define to the my_config.h. Right, thanks. > >> +if(EXISTS "${MYSQL_SOURCE_DIR}/pcre2") > >> + set(MYSQL_REGEX_INCLUDE_DIR "${MYSQL_SOURCE_DIR}/pcre2/src") > > > >eh, is that enough? > >there were a lot more changes in the server, than just correcting the > >path. > > Do you mean there's more to be done? Not sure i understand right. To make the server use pcre2 you had to change something in the sources, like, API function names, types names, etc. But for mroonga you've just changed the include path. I was surprised that it was enough. Perhaps mroonga doesn't use pcre at all? Otherwise how could've it compiled without you changing function names and types? Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0

[Maria-developers] sql_mode=oracle : Rollback on error
by jerome brauge 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hello Alexander, I've found one another difference between Mariadb and Oracle : oracle always rollback the active transaction if an error is raised, Maria leave the transaction active. Possible workaround in stored procedure: add an exit handler which do a rollback and resignal the error. What do you think about this ? Regards

4 7

[Maria-developers] Deprecate INT(M) in SHOW?
by Alexander Barkov 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hello, We have an optional length for integer data types: TINYINT(N) SMALLINT(N) MEDIUMINT(N) INT(N) BIGINT(N) The number given in the parentheses imposes no any limits on the supported range. So for example BIGINT(1) is still a full-featured data type that can store and retrieve any 64-bit number (btw, I find this confusing). If I declare a column without N, it's later displayed in SHOW CREATE TABLE with the default length, so: CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT) becomes CREATE TABLE t1 (a INT(11)); The length is really important only in two cases: 1. In combination with ZEROFILL. 2. When the explicitly specified length is larger than the default length for the data type. For example, INT(40). In this case on cast to string, it's converted to VARCHAR(40) rather than to VARCHAR(11). In all other cases the length does not matter and has no any visible effects. Does anybody see any problems if in 10.4 we fix all metadata statements, such as: - SHOW CREATE TABLE t1 - DESCRIBE t1 - SELECT * FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.COLUMNS not to print the default length for non-ZEROFILL columns?

4 5

Re: [Maria-developers] Analysis of the same name of field and name check constraints
by Anel Husakovic 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hi Vincentiu, Sorry but I have seen now, after sending the mail, that example in this mail is not relevant, please take a look in a example in PR. Regards, Anel On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 12:45 PM, Anel Husakovic <anel(a)mariadb.org> wrote: > Hi Vicentiu, > > Regarding the check constraints with *field *and *table *constraint that > have the same name for example: > *`create table t (a int, b check(b>0), constraint b check (b>10));`* > > when new rows are inserted and an error occurs, generated error is not > pointing to exact constraint. For example: > *`insert into t values (-1);`* > ERROR 4025 (23000): CONSTRAINT `b` failed for `test`.`t` > but this means different constraint. > > In order to solve this, here are my opinions: > 1. approach is not to allow this scenario while creating the table, > 2. approach is to generate different message one message for *table *constraint > second for *field *constraint depending where error occurs- and you told > me to go with this one. > > Out of curiosity I also tried with 1. approach problem is that in > *sql/sql_table.cc **mysql_prepare_create_table 4221* > *create/alter_info.check_constraint_list *is tied to table constraints. > However there is another attribute *field_check_constraints *for > *create_info *object but it is always *0*. It is updated in > * sql/unireg.cc* *783*. Problem is that *mysql_prepare_create_table *is > called first and after that *field_check_constraints *is updated,so > there is no mechanism to allow check in early stage for *table*-*field *check > constraint. > After that there is a validation according to the each constraint in > *sql/table.cc* *verify_constraints 5232* - and this is 2. approach. > > I finished 2. approach and what I have that each test already written in > main directory failed because of different error message for a specific > case. > So here is a patch for 2. approach: > https://github.com/MariaDB/server/pull/715 > > In this approach we are handling each error independently. > Also we need to change each test regarding the ER_CONSTRAINT_FAILED where > should be raised newly created error ER_FIELD_CONSTRAINT_FAILED. > > > Also I have updated PR *IS.check_constraint *, rebased everything in one > file > https://github.com/MariaDB/server/pull/689/ > > Best regards, > Anel > > > >

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] a20e1ce85ec: MDEV-13232: Assertion `(&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->count > 0 && pthread_equal(pthread_self(), (&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->thread)' failed in _ma_state_info_write
by Alexander Barkov 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hi Sanja, the patch is OK to push. Thanks. On 04/23/2018 12:37 PM, Oleksandr Byelkin wrote: > revision-id: a20e1ce85ec56616fa048e9ba39c25c65b098fce (mariadb-10.3.6-36-ga20e1ce85ec) > parent(s): c6ba758d1d41c11466b8f9b61b4546efc95aa689 > author: Oleksandr Byelkin > committer: Oleksandr Byelkin > timestamp: 2018-04-23 10:35:33 +0200 > message: > > MDEV-13232: Assertion `(&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->count > 0 && pthread_equal(pthread_self(), (&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->thread)' failed in _ma_state_info_write > > Limit length of result of "negative" operation to something reasonable > > --- > mysql-test/main/union.result | 14 ++++++++++++++ > mysql-test/main/union.test | 15 +++++++++++++++ > sql/item_func.cc | 3 +++ > 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/mysql-test/main/union.result b/mysql-test/main/union.result > index 4e5f9312e03..39cd68ae851 100644 > --- a/mysql-test/main/union.result > +++ b/mysql-test/main/union.result > @@ -2500,5 +2500,19 @@ t2 CREATE TABLE `t2` ( > DROP TABLE t2; > DROP TABLE t1; > # > +# MDEV-13232: Assertion `(&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->count > 0 && > +# pthread_equal(pthread_self(), (&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)-> > +# thread)' failed in _ma_state_info_write > +# > +CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 CHAR(8)); > +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('10'),('-10'); > +CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 CHAR); > +SET @a= CAST('10' AS CHAR); > +SELECT c1 FROM t1 UNION SELECT - @a FROM t2; > +c1 > +10 > +-10 > +drop table t1,t2; > +# > # End of 10.3 tests > # > diff --git a/mysql-test/main/union.test b/mysql-test/main/union.test > index f86cae87524..b9b38271f83 100644 > --- a/mysql-test/main/union.test > +++ b/mysql-test/main/union.test > @@ -1745,6 +1745,21 @@ SHOW CREATE TABLE t2; > DROP TABLE t2; > DROP TABLE t1; > > +--echo # > +--echo # MDEV-13232: Assertion `(&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)->count > 0 && > +--echo # pthread_equal(pthread_self(), (&(&share->intern_lock)->m_mutex)-> > +--echo # thread)' failed in _ma_state_info_write > +--echo # > + > +CREATE TABLE t1 (c1 CHAR(8)); > +INSERT INTO t1 VALUES ('10'),('-10'); > + > +CREATE TABLE t2 (c2 CHAR); > +SET @a= CAST('10' AS CHAR); > + > +SELECT c1 FROM t1 UNION SELECT - @a FROM t2; > + > +drop table t1,t2; > > --echo # > --echo # End of 10.3 tests > diff --git a/sql/item_func.cc b/sql/item_func.cc > index e2740272385..ae6c61e83f4 100644 > --- a/sql/item_func.cc > +++ b/sql/item_func.cc > @@ -1935,6 +1935,9 @@ void Item_func_neg::fix_length_and_dec_double() > set_handler(&type_handler_double); > decimals= args[0]->decimals; // Preserve NOT_FIXED_DEC > max_length= args[0]->max_length + 1; > + // Limit length with something reasonable > + uint32 mlen= type_handler()->max_display_length(this); > + set_if_smaller(max_length, mlen); > unsigned_flag= false; > } > > _______________________________________________ > commits mailing list > commits(a)mariadb.org > https://lists.askmonty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/commits >

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] ce222a7: MDEV-15915 Add Feature_json status variable.
by Sergei Golubchik 23 Apr '18

23 Apr '18

Hi, Alexey! On Apr 23, Alexey Botchkov wrote: > > Elena commented in MDEV about "Feature_json" being possibly confusing. > I've seen Elena's comment. Can also add GEOJSON functions to her list. > Still i can't figure out anything better than Feature_json as the name > for this variable. > The self-explaining name is either too long or possible misleading. Feature_json_functions ? But I think Feature_json is fine too, one hardly thinks of "EXPLAIN JSON" when talking about "JSON support". Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0