- developers - lists.mariadb.org

Re: [Maria-developers] More Secure Kill Command
by Sergei Golubchik 20 Aug '13

20 Aug '13

Hi, Roberto! On Aug 17, Roberto Spadim wrote: > Hi sergei, > What about give two informations, thread id and query id > If thread id and query id is equal, kill it There's no need to. Query id identifies the query and the connection unambiguously. Specifying also a thread id is redundant. Regards, Sergei

2 9

[Maria-developers] linking an external library
by rg 19 Aug '13

19 Aug '13

Folks, I want to link an external library for a language extension. After several hours of trying to tell cmake (^%$@*&) to pick it up for linking the library would still not be built with. CMakeLists.txt in trunk/sql is in the meantime full of pointers to the library without avail. I did the normal FIND_LIBRARY() followed by TARGET_LINK_LIBRARIES({$LIBNAME}) on various targets plus as nothing worked: SET(CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH) on it, explicity LINK_DIRECTORIES(), SET(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH), SET(CMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH) ... How do I link mariadb with an external library?? Thanks Rob

3 4

[Maria-developers] Audit plugin and qc_info plugin - MDEV-4682
by Roberto Spadim 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

Hi guys, i put some fields in qc_info plugin https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4581 the second part was add some others informations (stats): https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4682 i was reading the "response_time_distribution" of percona, patch at https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4568 could i use the audit plugin to implement MDEV-4682? what i need is: 1)know if the query was executed with/without query cache 2)know the time expend (lock time, and total time) to execute the query (first execution) 3)know the time expend with query cache hit 4) both (3) and (2) don't include time of network packages, just server side times... is it possible? any idea how could i implement it? i didn't write a audit plugin yet =( well.. time to learn =D thanks guys! -- Roberto Spadim

2 2

[Maria-developers] ALTER ONLINE TABLE syntax
by Sergei Golubchik 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

Hi, You've added this ALTER ONLINE TABLE syntax, where ONLINE de facto means "without copying the data". Now, after 5.6 merge we also have ALGORITHM=COPY|INPLACE and LOCK=NONE|SHARED|EXCLUSIVE. I've mapped ONLINE to ALGORITHM=INPLACE, because that's what it means. But it's confusing, one can have an "inplace" operation under an exclusive lock, if the engine wants it that way. And it won't be "online" by any stretch of imagination. One can also technically have a "copy" operation with a very permissive write-allow-write lock, and it'll be as online as one can get it. I mean, logically ONLINE should mean LOCK=NONE, not ALGORITHM=INPLACE. But that would change the existing behavior and the test results too. For example, *any* ALTER on the temporary table would always be "online", because, well, it wouldn't take any lock on that table. Alternatively, we can keep ONLINE as ALGORITHM=INPLACE, and deprecate it, issue a warning, suggesting to use the new 5.6 syntax. Opinions? Regards, Sergei

5 7

[Maria-developers] MDEV-4916
by Roberto Spadim 18 Aug '13

18 Aug '13

Patch uploaded, and test work (but i didn't add a unit test yet :/ sorry i don't know yet how to write it) -- Roberto Spadim

1 0

[Maria-developers] Joining the team
by Esteban Orduno 17 Aug '13

17 Aug '13

Hi, all: I would like to contribute to the maria-db team. Who can I talk iniatially to get some type of orientation about it? Esteban Orduno

2 1

[Maria-developers] More Secure Kill Command
by Roberto Spadim 17 Aug '13

17 Aug '13

Hi guys i was mailing at maria-discuss, but i think it a new feature, and want some view point from developers... check this problem: connection 1) big select... connection 2) show processlist connection 1) other query connection 2) kill connection 1 id (i take +- 1 second between show processlist and this command) connection 1) killed the problem? the kill connection 1 (KILL thread_id) killed the wrong query could we implement something like: KILL [CONNECTION | QUERY] thread_id [QUERY "some relative unique query id in this database"] the relative unique query id, could be: substr(sha1 or md5 of (thread_id + query start time),0,6) (6 hex numbers is good?) it's like a git small hash commit id, maybe we could make it more unique... but since i will not use it very often, i think a less intensive work is nice here... a global query id could add more one lock for every query... example: KILL 1 QUERY "abcdef" the "abcdef" = substr(MD5( thread id + query start time ),0,6) we could add client ip or others unique information about this query, but something that don't increase (ok just a little) the load of a show processlist / select * from information_schema thanks -- Roberto Spadim

4 7

[Maria-developers] MariaDB 10.0.4 Release Prep
by Daniel Bartholomew 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

All, I've begun prep work for the MariaDB 10.0.4 release. Draft Release Notes and Changelogs are here: - https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1004-release-notes/ - https://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-1004-changelog/ Please let me know ASAP if anything needs to be added/changed/etc... Thanks. -- Daniel Bartholomew Google+ - http://gplus.to/dbart Twitter - http://twitter.com/daniel_bart MariaDB: An Enhanced Drop-in Replacement for MySQL Website - http://mariadb.org Twitter - http://twitter.com/mariadb Google+ - http://google.com/+mariadb Facebook - http://fb.com/MariaDB.dbms Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org

3 4

[Maria-developers] RFC - query cache insert
by Roberto Spadim 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

Hi guys! I was reading (again) the query cache source code of 10.0.3 ... please tell me if i understood right when we insert at query cache... thread put a lock in query cache (no one can result from query cache) thread read all data and write to network (caching the result to query cache) after end of thread real the query cache is unlocked.. my doubts are... what happen if the query is too slow? the query cache is disabled while executing the query? what happen if two equal queries (same SELECT) execute? the first one is locked until the second one end the query and get the result from query cache? or the first lock query cache and the second runs without query cache? the last one there's any query cache changes in mind? i was reading the sql_cache.cc of old mysql servers and there's a todo list (very old i think) that didn't changed from old mysql to today mariadb 10.0.3, this todo list is inside mysql bug tracker? or mariadb jira? thanks guys! -- Roberto Spadim

2 11

[Maria-developers] doubt about workaround on MDEV-4903
by Roberto Spadim 16 Aug '13

16 Aug '13

hi guys, could anyone help me with a workaround to this MDEV? https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4903 basically the problem is a (more than one column primary key) IN ( (a primary key const value), (a primary key const value), (a primary key const value), (a primary key const value) ) it runs a table scan instead of using the primary key index using OR = OR = OR =, use the index but i want a easier way to write this query thanks -- Roberto Spadim

1 0