- developers - lists.mariadb.org

[Maria-developers] MDEV-11340 Allow multiple alternative authentication methods for the same user
by serg＠mariadb.org 15 May '17

15 May '17

Hi, Ankit! I've started writing down my thoughts about MDEV-11340 "Allow multiple alternative authentication methods for the same user" See MDEV-11340 and feel free to comment on it. Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] 8edbb1117a9: MDEV-12741: innodb.ibuf_not_empty failed in buildbot with "InnoDB: Trying to do I/O to a tablespace which does not exist"
by Marko Mäkelä 15 May '17

15 May '17

On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 11:25 AM, jan <jan.lindstrom(a)mariadb.com> wrote: > revision-id: 8edbb1117a9e1fd81fbd08b8f1d06c72efe38f44 (mariadb-10.2.5-168- > g8edbb1117a9) > parent(s): f4df8c00c957146f04db031f1f9f80aab229d1d2 > author: Jan Lindström > committer: Jan Lindström > timestamp: 2017-05-11 11:15:37 +0300 > message: > > MDEV-12741: innodb.ibuf_not_empty failed in buildbot with "InnoDB: Trying > to do I/O to a tablespace which does not exist" > > … [View More]

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] e6dabcd: MDEV-11196: Error:Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'key_buff'
by Sergey Petrunia 12 May '17

12 May '17

Hi Varun, So I am debugging the testcase from the bug report. I reach these lines: > if(i) > ext_key_length+= key_part->length; (Why there is no indentation btw?) and I see: (gdb) p key_part->length $40 = 3072 3072=1024*3, that is, the NULL-byte and length bytes are NOT counted. The code then proceeds to check if pk_length + ext_key_length <= MAX_KEY_LENGTH but that check could produce a wrong result if NULL- and length- bytes are not counted. The second … [View More]issue is that I don't see where ext_key_length is zero'ed. I try debugging this query: CREATE TABLE t2 ( pk INT, f1 VARCHAR(3), f2 VARCHAR(1024), f2a VARCHAR(1024), PRIMARY KEY (pk), KEY(f2), KEY(f2a) ) ENGINE=InnoDB CHARSET utf8; I put a breakpoint at this line: > if (share->use_ext_keys && i && !(keyinfo->flags & HA_NOSAME) > && (pk_length + ext_key_length <= MAX_KEY_LENGTH)) (84 chars! where's the coding style again?) and I observe: (gdb) print ext_key_length $45 = 6144 This is clearly more than any [possible] key length for the table. So, this particular patch is not a solution (even if the testcase happens to pass with it). On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 04:23:11PM +0530, Varun wrote: > revision-id: e6dabcd3a7e994feaa1a1dc5d0c1a0d621272f72 (mariadb-10.2.2-387-ge6dabcd) > parent(s): 39bce67b7aa27fc7e5458f36838148f6e0f4c3af > author: Varun Gupta > committer: Varun Gupta > timestamp: 2017-05-08 16:21:32 +0530 > message: > > MDEV-11196: Error:Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'key_buff' > was corrupted, server crashes in opt_sum_query > > extended keys feature disabled if the length of extended key is longer than MAX_KEY_LEN > > --- > sql/table.cc | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/sql/table.cc b/sql/table.cc > index 398383e..554fc78 100644 > --- a/sql/table.cc > +++ b/sql/table.cc > @@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ static bool create_key_infos(const uchar *strpos, const uchar *frm_image_end, > KEY_PART_INFO *key_part= NULL; > ulong *rec_per_key= NULL; > KEY_PART_INFO *first_key_part= NULL; > - uint first_key_parts= 0; > + uint first_key_parts= 0, pk_length=0, ext_key_length=0; > > if (!keys) > { > @@ -765,6 +765,7 @@ static bool create_key_infos(const uchar *strpos, const uchar *frm_image_end, > keyinfo->algorithm= first_keyinfo->algorithm; > if (new_frm_ver >= 3) > keyinfo->block_size= first_keyinfo->block_size; > + pk_length= keyinfo->key_length; > } > > keyinfo->key_part= key_part; > @@ -796,6 +797,8 @@ static bool create_key_infos(const uchar *strpos, const uchar *frm_image_end, > strpos+=7; > } > key_part->store_length=key_part->length; > + if(i) > + ext_key_length+= key_part->length; > } > > /* > @@ -805,7 +808,8 @@ static bool create_key_infos(const uchar *strpos, const uchar *frm_image_end, > keyinfo->ext_key_parts= keyinfo->user_defined_key_parts; > keyinfo->ext_key_flags= keyinfo->flags; > keyinfo->ext_key_part_map= 0; > - if (share->use_ext_keys && i && !(keyinfo->flags & HA_NOSAME)) > + if (share->use_ext_keys && i && !(keyinfo->flags & HA_NOSAME) > + && (pk_length + ext_key_length <= MAX_KEY_LENGTH)) > { > for (j= 0; > j < first_key_parts && keyinfo->ext_key_parts < MAX_REF_PARTS; > _______________________________________________ > commits mailing list > commits(a)mariadb.org > https://lists.askmonty.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/commits -- BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer MariaDB Corporation | Skype: sergefp | Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog [View Less]

1 0

[Maria-developers] MDEV-10764 PL/SQL parser - Phase 2 / MDEV-12137
by jerome brauge 11 May '17

11 May '17

Hello everyone, I've done a patch for MDEV-12137 based on branch bb-10.2-ext (DELETE statement with the same source and target). At this time the patch is for all sql_mode. It could be interesting to add an information in explain plan to indicate the extra step. Something like : +------+--------------------+------------+------+---------------+---------------+---------+--------------------+------+-------------+ | id | select_type | table | type | possible_keys | key | … [View More]

2 1

[Maria-developers] mariadb-java-client 1.6.0 does not work from yesterday update ?
by Krishnan, Gnanavel (Nokia - IN/Chennai) 11 May '17

11 May '17

Hi All, I was using mariadb java client jar version 1.6.0. but looks it is not present in release document Also from yesterday 1.6.0 jar gets updated not sure why Should use only 1.5.9 or 2.0.0 rc ? https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/mariadb/jdbc/mariadb-java-client/1.6.0/ Thank you, Gnanavel.

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] 39bce67: MDEV-11196: Error:Run-Time Check Failure #2 - Stack around the variable 'key_buff'
by Sergey Petrunia 10 May '17

10 May '17

Hi Varun, First reaction: > diff --git a/sql/sql_table.cc b/sql/sql_table.cc > index 84e4018..63636f9 100644 > --- a/sql/sql_table.cc > +++ b/sql/sql_table.cc > @@ -3948,7 +3948,11 @@ mysql_prepare_create_table(THD *thd, HA_CREATE_INFO *create_info, > key_part_info->fieldnr= field; > key_part_info->offset= (uint16) sql_field->offset; > key_part_info->key_type=sql_field->pack_flag; > - uint key_part_length= sql_field->… [View More]

1 0

[Maria-developers] MDEV-12775 Reuse data type aggregation code for hybrid functions and UNION
by Alexander Barkov 10 May '17

10 May '17

Hello Sanja, Please review a patch for MDEV-12775, also fixing a number of bugs: - MDEV-9495 Wrong field type for a UNION of a signed and an unsigned INT expression - MDEV-9497 UNION and COALESCE produce different field types for DECIMAL+INT - MDEV-12594 UNION between fixed length double columns does not always preserve scale - MDEV-12595 UNION converts INT to BIGINT - MDEV-12599 UNION is not symmetric when mixing INT and CHAR Thanks!

1 0

[Maria-developers] galera source and direction
by Daniel Black 09 May '17

09 May '17

With Codership's galera repository showing spelling fixes and test case changes as the only changes this year, and Percona's galera repository streaming ahead with improvements, is Percona's galera becoming the new base? I did a quick test though and the mtr tests all pass with Percona's galera on the 10.2 branch head.

1 0

[Maria-developers] Google Summer of Code 2017 students
by Daniel Black 05 May '17

05 May '17

Folks I'd like to welcome our Google Summer of Code students. https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/organizations/5889423829893120/#projects Ankit Kumar - Allow multiple alternative authentication methods for the same user mentor: Sergei Golubchik Daniil Medvedev - Full DECIMAL support in ColumnStore mentor: Andrew Hutchings Sumit Lakra - NUMA GSoC Project Proposal mentors: Daniel Black and Jan Lindström Galina Shalygina - Transformation of IN predicate into IN subquery based on … [View More]

1 0

[Maria-developers] MDEV-7049 MySQL#74585 - InnoDB: Failing assertion: *mbmaxlen < 5 in file ha_innodb.cc line 1904
by Alexander Barkov 04 May '17

04 May '17

Hello Marko, InnoDB uses 5 bits to store the combination of mbminlen and mbmaxlen, and its calculated as: mbmaxlen * 5 + mbminlen Note, combinations with mbminlen=0 and mbmaxlen=0 are not possible. Also, combinations with mbminlen>mbmaxlen are not possible. This is a summary: mbminlen mbmaxlen 0 1 2 3 4 0 (0) (1) (2) (3) (4) 1 (5) 6 (7) (8) (9) 2 (10) 11 12 (13) (14) 3 (15) 16 17 18 (19) 4 (20) 21 22 23 … [View More]

2 2