- developers - lists.mariadb.org

[Maria-developers] federated bug: Bug #61526 create table .. like .. federated table crashes with auto_increment column
by xiaobing jiang 14 May '12

14 May '12

hi all: I try to fix the bug: http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=61526. but after dig the code, I found that the federated seems don't support "create table xx like yy". the function miss the "share->connect_string", so it always report: ERROR 1 (HY000): server name: '' doesn't exist! from the page: http://kb.askmonty.org/en/about-federatedx, it says: The FederatedX Storage Engine is a fork of the Federated Storage Engine, the latter of the two no longer being maintained by Oracle. The purpose of FederatedX is to keep this storage engine's development progressing-- to both add new features as well as fix old bugs. is it really? so will oracle accept the patch? Thanks!

3 4

Re: [Maria-developers] Added --continue-on-error to mysqltest and mysql-test-run in lp:maria/5.5
by Sergei Golubchik 12 May '12

12 May '12

Hi, Monty! On May 04, Michael Widenius wrote: > At lp:maria/5.5 > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 3393 > revision-id: monty(a)askmonty.org-20120504133709-w1l2t1vhvpqupu3v > parent: monty(a)askmonty.org-20120503130041-fb9myku0uh1qybty > committer: Michael Widenius <monty(a)askmonty.org> > branch nick: maria-5.5 > timestamp: Fri 2012-05-04 16:37:09 +0300 > message: > Added --continue-on-error to mysqltest and mysql-test-run > This will contune the test case even if there was an error. This makes it easier to run a test that contains many sub tests against one engine. First, you forgot to test the new feature. see mysqltest.test for examples > === modified file 'client/mysqltest.cc' > --- a/client/mysqltest.cc 2012-02-23 06:50:11 +0000 > +++ b/client/mysqltest.cc 2012-05-04 13:37:09 +0000 > @@ -1746,9 +1791,15 @@ static int diff_check(const char *diff_n > my_snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "%s -v", diff_name); > > if (!(res_file= popen(buf, "r"))) > - die("popen(\"%s\", \"r\") failed", buf); > + { > + report_or_die("popen(\"%s\", \"r\") failed", buf); > + return; > + } I doubt it makes sense to continue in this case > - /* if diff is not present, nothing will be in stdout to increment have_diff */ > + /* > + if diff is not present, nothing will be in stdout to increment > + have_diff > + */ > if (fgets(buf, sizeof(buf), res_file)) > have_diff= 1; > > @@ -2069,9 +2120,13 @@ void check_result() > > switch (compare_files(log_file.file_name(), result_file_name)) { > case RESULT_OK: > - break; /* ok */ > + if (!error_count) > + break; /* ok */ > + mess= "Got errors while running test"; I wonder whether you need it. As the error goes into the result, it'll inevitably end up in the .reject file. one can get RESULT_OK only if the same error is present in the .result file. But in this case you won't increment error_count, because an error in the result file means --error directive. > + /* Fallthrough */ > case RESULT_LENGTH_MISMATCH: > - mess= "Result length mismatch\n"; > + if (!mess) > + mess= "Result length mismatch\n"; > /* Fallthrough */ > case RESULT_CONTENT_MISMATCH: > { > @@ -3240,8 +3319,10 @@ void do_exec(struct st_command *command) > log_msg("exec of '%s' failed, error: %d, status: %d, errno: %d", > ds_cmd.str, error, status, errno); > dynstr_free(&ds_cmd); > - die("command \"%s\" failed\n\nOutput from before failure:\n%s\n", > - command->first_argument, ds_res.str); > + if (!opt_continue_on_error) > + die("command \"%s\" failed\n\nOutput from before failure:\n%s\n", > + command->first_argument, ds_res.str); why not report_or_die ? > + return; > } > > DBUG_PRINT("info", > @@ -3941,12 +4030,12 @@ void read_until_delimiter(DYNAMIC_STRING > No characters except \n are allowed on > the same line as the command > */ > - die("Trailing characters found after command"); > + report_or_die("Trailing characters found after command"); I think --continue-on-error should not affect syntax errors in the test script itself. They should always abort the execution. in general, you've documented the new option as "This is mostly useful when testing a storage engine and one wants to see how much of a multi-test file it can execute." which is also what BigFish wanted it to do. So, most (if not all) mysqltest failures not related to a storage engine should not be ignored. > } > > if (feof(cur_file->file)) > - die("End of file encountered before '%s' delimiter was found", > - ds_delimiter->str); > + report_or_die("End of file encountered before '%s' delimiter was found", > + ds_delimiter->str); > > if (match_delimiter(c, ds_delimiter->str, ds_delimiter->length)) > { > === modified file 'mysql-test/mysql-test-run.pl' > --- a/mysql-test/mysql-test-run.pl 2012-05-03 13:00:41 +0000 > +++ b/mysql-test/mysql-test-run.pl 2012-05-04 13:37:09 +0000 > @@ -5805,6 +5807,11 @@ sub start_mysqltest ($) { > mtr_add_arg($args, "--max-connections=%d", $opt_max_connections); > } > > + if ($opt_continue_on_error) > + { > + mtr_add_arg($args, "--continue-on-error"); I think this should enable --force too. or, perhaps, --force should enable this and one does not need a separate --continue-on-error in mtr. > + } > + > if ( $opt_embedded_server ) > { > Regards, Sergei

1 0

[Maria-developers] Request for testing: MWL#182 SHOW EXPLAIN
by Sergei Petrunia 11 May '12

11 May '12

Hi Elena, I need testing for MWL#182 SHOW EXPLAIN. The code is here: lp:~maria-captains/maria/5.3-show-explain2 (note the '2' at the end) The branch is currently based on 5.3, although will move to 5.5 soon (I suppose this doesn't cause any problems for testing). Currently, I can think of two things that need testing: === "Asynchronous Procedure Call" module === This is a module that allows one thread to schedule a call in the other thread, and wait until the call has been invoked. Suggested way to test: - run a set of queries that look at each other with "SHOW EXPLAIN FOR <thread>" statements. - have some "victim" threads which run long queries, and have "attacker" threads which submit a lot of "SHOW EXPLAIN FOR <victim_thread>" queries. === On-the-fly EXPLAIN printing functionality === Before this WL, the code that produced EXPLAIN output - Required that optimizer produces a slightly different structures when EXPLAIN is running - Did destructive modifications to the query plan (that is, it was not possible to call these functions two times to get two EXPLAIN outputs for the same planned query) Suggested way to test: - Run various complicated queries, with UNIONs, JOINs, etc. - While they are running, do SHOW EXPLAIN FOR command for them, expecting it to crash or produce nonsensical output at some point. If SHOW EXPLAIN crashes, the crash report will show the query it was trying to obtain the EXPLAIN for. My current suggestion is to use some "runner" threads to run the queries and use another set of threads to hit the "runner" threads with SHOW EXPLAIN request. When creating tests in mysql-test/t/show_explain.test, I made a framework that allows to stop query execution at some particular point and then wait until some number of SHOW EXPLAIN requests were arrived and served. This requires insertion of "probes" into the source code, though. Perhaps, we could use something like that for your testing: to have the query pause at some "interesting" points and wait for SHOW EXPLAIN requests to arrive and be served. I wasn't able to come up with any intelligent way to find interesting point though, so this is still just an idea. BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer Monty Program AB, http://askmonty.org Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog

1 1

Re: [Maria-developers] Added --continue-on-error to mysqltest and mysql-test-run
by Sergei Golubchik 07 May '12

07 May '12

Hi, Monty! On May 04, Michael Widenius wrote: > At lp:maria/5.5 > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 3393 > committer: Michael Widenius <monty(a)askmonty.org> > branch nick: maria-5.5 > message: > Added --continue-on-error to mysqltest and mysql-test-run > This will contune the test case even if there was an error. This > makes it easier to run a test that contains many sub tests against > one engine. Monty, why did you do your parallel implementation of this feature, instead of using the existing abort_on_error flag? Regards, Sergei

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] MDEV-255: Compile handlersocket plugin in 5.5
by Sergei Golubchik 07 May '12

07 May '12

Hi, Vladislav! On May 05, Vladislav Vaintroub wrote: > ------------------------------------------------------------ > revno: 3398 > revision-id: wlad(a)montyprogram.com-20120505003610-rz89d70v8c6n5v0c > parent: wlad(a)montyprogram.com-20120504152240-ptie9ox0vjqqukd4 > committer: Vladislav Vaintroub <wlad(a)montyprogram.com> > branch nick: 5.5 > timestamp: Sat 2012-05-05 02:36:10 +0200 > message: > MDEV-255: Compile handlersocket plugin in 5.5 > === added file 'plugin/handler_socket/CMakeLists.txt' > --- a/plugin/handler_socket/CMakeLists.txt 1970-01-01 00:00:00 +0000 > +++ b/plugin/handler_socket/CMakeLists.txt 2012-05-05 00:36:10 +0000 > @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > + > +IF(WIN32 OR CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME MATCHES "FreeBSD") > + # Handlersocket does not compile on Windows, compiles but does > + # not start on FreeBSD. Why does it not start of BSD? > + RETURN() > +ENDIF() > + > +#Remove -fno-implicit-templates from compiler flags(handlersocket would not work with it) > +IF(CMAKE_COMPILER_IS_GNUCXX) > + STRING(REPLACE "-fno-implicit-templates" "" CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS ${CMAKE_CXX_FLAGS}) Do we still compile with -fno-implicit-templates? I thought we don't use it anymore. We shouldn't. > +ENDIF() > + > === modified file 'plugin/handler_socket/handlersocket/mysql_incl.hpp' > --- a/plugin/handler_socket/handlersocket/mysql_incl.hpp 2011-06-07 11:19:49 +0000 > +++ b/plugin/handler_socket/handlersocket/mysql_incl.hpp 2012-05-05 00:36:10 +0000 > @@ -13,7 +13,10 @@ > #define HAVE_CONFIG_H > #endif > > +#ifndef MYSQL_DYNAMIC_PLUGIN > #define MYSQL_DYNAMIC_PLUGIN > +#endif I prefer not to have #ifdef, but instead write #define MYSQL_DYNAMIC_PLUGIN 1 you apparently got macro redefinition warning, right? Because there was -DMYSQL_DYNAMIC_PLUGIN on the gcc command line? It defines MYSQL_DYNAMIC_PLUGIN to be 1, and when it's redefined in the source to the empty string you get a warning. "Redefining" it to the same value of 1 is okay, there will be no warning for it. That's why all such symbols should be defined to 1, not to an empty string. > + > #define MYSQL_SERVER 1 > Regards, Sergei

2 2

[Maria-developers] KB Question: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server and MariaDB 5.5.23
by Daniel Bartholomew 07 May '12

07 May '12

A question has been posted to the Knowledgebase: http://kb.askmonty.org/en/ubuntu-1004-lts-server-and-mariadb-5523 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Server and MariaDB 5.5.23 After installing fresh mariadb, I'm having troubles using some software compiled with the mysql support. For ex. mysql2 ruby gem: Incorrect MySQL client library version! This gem was compiled for 5.5.23-MariaDB but the client library is 5.1.61 Quick investigation took me into this conclusions: mariadb-client-5.5 introduces new libmariadbclient18, but depends on libdbd-mysql-perl which depends on libmysqlclient16. So after install we have 2 libraries: libmysqlclient.so.16(from original mysql) and libmysqlclient.so.18(from mariadb). And default libmysqlclient.so is symlinked to libmysqlclient.so.16 Can this be solved in some way? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- Daniel Bartholomew MariaDB - http://mariadb.org Monty Program - http://montyprogram.com AskMonty Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org

2 1

[Maria-developers] A question about JOIN re-execution by subquery code
by Sergei Petrunia 06 May '12

06 May '12

Hi Sanja, As far I understand, JOIN structure has two "modules" to support join re-execution: M1. save_join_tab() saves/restores the contents of JOIN::join_tab array, as if execution process changed JOIN_TAB structures M2. JOIN::tmp_join is used to save/restore the contents of JOIN structure itself. What puzzles me are two questions: Q1: Why do we have separate functions to M1 and M2, instead of one "save everything" call, and one "restore everything" call? Q2: Why does M1 copy the whole JOIN_TAB structures? I've made a patch which makes it to save/restore JOIN::join_tab pointer instead (attached), and it passed all tests in the main test suite. (I am asking all this in connection with bug MDEV-238 on MWL#182 code) BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer Monty Program AB, http://askmonty.org Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog

1 0

[Maria-developers] MariaDB 5.3.7 release prep
by Daniel Bartholomew 04 May '12

04 May '12

All, The packages and other files for MariaDB 5.3.7 have been uploaded to the primary mirror and we're waiting for the other mirrors to pick up the new files before announcing the release. I've created preliminary changelog and release notes pages for the release here: http://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-537-release-notes http://kb.askmonty.org/en/mariadb-537-changelog From the changelog, it appears this is primarily a bug-fix release. If there are any particularly notable bugs or features of this release which I should make mention of in the release notes, let me know ASAP. Thanks. -- Daniel Bartholomew MariaDB - http://mariadb.org Monty Program - http://montyprogram.com AskMonty Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org

1 0

[Maria-developers] proposed patch for handler APIs for range query information
by Zardosht Kasheff 02 May '12

02 May '12

Hello all, After talking with Colin Charles last night, I have been encouraged to send more patches for MariaDB. Here is a hopefully simple one that benefits all storage engines. Attached is a proposed patch of new handler APIs. The purpose of this patch is to give storage engines more information about impending range queries. The idea is if MySQL is about to perform a range query from a to b, then the handler is informed that a range query is about to happen. It extends functionality like handler::prepare_index_scan to other scenarios. We use it to know how much data to prefetch and prelock before doing a range query. Any storage engine can use this as a heuristic for optimizing range query performance. I would love to hear feedback -Zardosht

2 2

[Maria-developers] KB Question: Aria features ?
by Daniel Bartholomew 30 Apr '12

30 Apr '12

A question has been posted to the Knowledgebase: http://kb.askmonty.org/en/aria-features - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Aria features ? When Aria Engine is a new generation MyISAM Engine , whether the new features: - parallel index creating? - merge table? - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Thanks. -- Daniel Bartholomew MariaDB - http://mariadb.org Monty Program - http://montyprogram.com AskMonty Knowledgebase - http://kb.askmonty.org

1 0