- developers - lists.mariadb.org

[Maria-developers] help with parser
by Roberto Spadim 20 Jun '13

20 Jun '13

hi guys i'm trying to implement MDEV-4579<https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4579>, could anyone help me with parser + warning generation? MDEV-4579 title: SQL PARSER - Add Ignore to SET SQL command example: SET @@some_global_variable_that_dont_exists=1 *this cause an error* SET @@some_global_variable_that_dont_exists=1,@@some_variable_that_exists_and_should_be_changed=3 *this cause an error and don't change the second variable* *could we implement:* SET *IGNORE * @@some_global_variable_that_dont_exists=1,@@some_variable_that_exists_and_should_be_changed=3 *this cause an warning (first variable don't exists) and change the second variable* thanks -- Roberto Spadim

2 1

[Maria-developers] [GSoC] Kerberize MariaDB -- some unclear point about the project
by QIU Shuang 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Hi Wlad and the community, I've developed a Kerberos plugin prototype with both raw API and GSSAPI supported on my own Linux box. The codes are pushed to my private repo already. It is just a prototype, which can handle only the normal case, without any tests in deployed environment. And I know there is a long way to go before accepted I now have a clear knowledge about the control flow of authentication plugin and Kerberos protocol. The working use case is like this: 1. login my computer as, for example, qiush; 2. create a user in MariaDB named qiush; 3. get the initial credential from Kerberos Key Distribution Center (KDC), i.e. tgt; 4. connect mysqld as qiush and now I can login DBMS passwordlessly before tgt expires. Correctly me if I miss something in this case. The exception case is how to get/renew tgt when the original expired. I have created a private repo based on 5.5 release version, which is available at https://launchpad.net/~qiush-summer. For those that concern about our project, you can track my progress. (The reason why I choose 5.5 release version instead of the latest development branch 10.x is that I cannot clone the repo lp:~maria-captains/maria/10.0-base from launchpad and I don't know why. I'll figure it out later if necessary). Some problems (three, exactly) when implementing the toy plugin. The first one is about the private repo and bazaar (I'm a git guy and have little experience working with bazaar). In order to make some demonstrated progress, I push my local update to the private repo each time I create a new commit. It seems the commit number is global (see the screen shot of my private repo history below). Recent revisions 3796. By Shuang Qiu 20 hours ago prototype with GSSAPI enabled 3795. By Shuang Qiu on 2013-06-15 Kerberos plugin prototype with raw krb5 API 3794. By Shuang Qiu on 2013-06-13 doodle 3793. By Michael Widenius on 2013-06-11 Fixed tests that failed on 32 bit because of my earlier fixes of 32 bit limits. 3792. By Sergei on 2013-06-07 MDEV-4468 Assertion `error != 0' fails or timeout occurs on select from a FEDERATED table which points at a non-existent table I'm afraid that my commits may pollute the code base. So the question is that will others (e.g. Sergei since commit 3792) see my changes next time he gets local branch updated. Is it the best practice to use bazaar like this (push after each commit)? If not, could you please give me some suggestion to use bazaar and launchpad correctly in our community? The other two are about the exception case. When get the initial credential from KDC, clients/services are asked for a password or asked to provide a keytab file to derive a long-term key that can be used encrypting messages between clients and KDC. On the server/service side, I think the keytab approach is better. Otherwise, each time we restart the service, a password will be asked. It may be annoying, I think :p. Then how to figure out the name of keytab file? I can come up with three approaches: 1. hard coded the filename and document the keytab file name clearly in the manual for users to follow (not the best choice, I think); 2. use the default Kerberos setting, which is /etc/krb5.keytab when properly configured; 3. make the filename an option in configuration file, e.g. ~/.my.cnf, with a default value /etc/krb5.keytab, since it is the default Kerberos setting. I prefer the third solution. As to the client side, I think both are OK. The problem of keytab choice is the same. Then I try to get some hints from similar password requesting authentication plugin. I read code in plugin/auth_dialog and plugin/auth_examples where server plugin and client plugin are implemented separately. In the client plugin, a external function of type mysql_authenticaton_dialog_ask_t static mysql_authentication_dialog_ask_t ask; can be provided as an alternative to command line input. Should I also implement them in two parts? And also provide the mysql_authentication_dialog_ask_t hook? The last problem. Kerberos requires user to provide a service name to resolve before requesting service ticket. How to name our service? Hard coded it as MYSQL or set in configuration file (I prefer the latter one)? Let me know your thoughts :). Thank you very much and best regards! Sincerely, Shuang

2 2

Re: [Maria-developers] [GSoC] Kerberize MariaDB -- some unclear point about the project
by QIU Shuang 19 Jun '13

19 Jun '13

Hi serg, Thank you for your comment. I will clean my repo at some later time follow your advice. :) Sincerely, Shuang On Jun 18, 2013, at 4:51 PM, Sergei Golubchik <serg(a)mariadb.org> wrote: > Hi, QIU Shuang! > > Just to answer the bzr part: > > On Jun 16, QIU Shuang wrote: >> The first one is about the private repo and bazaar (I'm a git guy and >> have little experience working with bazaar). In order to make some >> demonstrated progress, I push my local update to the private repo each >> time I create a new commit. It seems the commit number is global (see >> the screen shot of my private repo history below). >> >> Recent revisions >> 3796. By Shuang Qiu 20 hours ago >> prototype with GSSAPI enabled >> 3795. By Shuang Qiu on 2013-06-15 >> Kerberos plugin prototype with raw krb5 API >> 3794. By Shuang Qiu on 2013-06-13 >> doodle >> 3793. By Michael Widenius on 2013-06-11 >> Fixed tests that failed on 32 bit because of my earlier fixes of 32 bit limits. >> 3792. By Sergei on 2013-06-07 >> MDEV-4468 Assertion `error != 0' fails or timeout occurs on select from a FEDERATED table which points at a non-existent table >> >> I'm afraid that my commits may pollute the code base. So the question >> is that will others (e.g. Sergei since commit 3792) see my changes >> next time he gets local branch updated. Is it the best practice to >> use bazaar like this (push after each commit)? > > Don't worry about it. Revision numbers in bzr aren't stable, during a > merge they might be renumbered (*). Revision ids are stable and unique, > but they look like > > sergii(a)pisem.net-20130607133513-p27s1bg8gt0amkiw > > (this is for my commit with revno 3792 above). > Think of revision numbers as of convenient shortcuts that help to avoid > typing and that are easy to remember. But don't use them for long-term > references or something. > > And no, I won't see your changes when I pull from 5.5. > Not unless I pull from your repository. > > Regards, > Sergei > > [1]. Details. Example. Say you have a repo with only one changeset. It > has revno 1. You've branched. And you've made changes and committed > something in both branches, independently. Every branch has now two > changesets. Changeset 1 (it's the same in both, save revid), and > Changeset 2 (revno is the same, revid is different). Now if you merge > the second branch into the first, the changeset 2 of the second branch > will be renumbered, it'll get revno 1.1 (but its revid won't change). > The history will look like (Changeset 3 is the merge changeset): > > 1 > | \ > 2 1.1 > | / > 3 > >

1 0

[Maria-developers] mysql 5.6, 5.7
by Roberto Spadim 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

hi guys, i was reading mysql 5.6 and 5.7 manual i know that mariadb is very different (a bit) than mysql internally there's a mysql merge issue or something like that i can see what will be merged and what not? i like the partition lock prune, memcache and optimizer tracer of mysql 5.6, but today i'm not using it in mariadb (not a problem, but it's nice features) -- Roberto Spadim

3 6

Re: [Maria-developers] review / close MDEV-4581
by Roberto Spadim 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

nice! thanks sergei! i think it's now rich in features, maybe should be used by community to check if it's usefull (there's many columns) thanks again! 2013/6/18 Sergei Golubchik <serg(a)mariadb.org> > Hi, Roberto! > > On Jun 18, Roberto Spadim wrote: > > hi guys, could review / close > > MDEV-4581<https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4581> ? > > Roberto, as you can see in Jira, > MDEV-4581 is assigned to me, it's targeted for the 10.0.4 release. > So yes, I could and I will. > > Regards, > Sergei > -- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] close some mdev
by Roberto Spadim 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

hi sergei! thanks about others mdev, and yes mdev 4583 shouldn't be closed, i will study a bit more to see what can be done to write a patch about it and test the speed of a procedure removing query cache queries 2013/6/18 Sergei Golubchik <serg(a)mariadb.org> > Hi, Roberto! > > On Jun 17, Roberto Spadim wrote: > > hi guys could anyone close some opened and fixed (won't fix) mdev's ? the > > comment explain why to close it > > > > MDEV-4571 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4571> > > MDEV-4589 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4589> > > MDEV-575 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-575> > > Closed. > > > MDEV-4583 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4583> > > Not closed, it doesn't have a comment like the three above? > Should I still close it? > > Regards, > Sergei > -- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial

1 0

[Maria-developers] a problem of Parallel replication
by nanyi607rao 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

hi, when i read patchs from http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~knielsen/maria/dingqi-parallel-replication/cha…, i found a problem (maybe would cause bug) :main SQL thread read a event from relay log, it make the log_event->thd point to the thd of main SQL thread. But when a log_event is disaptched to a sub SQL thread, the log_event->thd still point to the old value instead of the thd of sub SQL thread. this problem will lead check_stack_overrun() fails, then lead open_table() fails... maybe this will be helpful to you . 2013-06-18 nanyi607rao

1 0

[Maria-developers] review / close MDEV-4581
by Roberto Spadim 18 Jun '13

18 Jun '13

hi guys, could review / close MDEV-4581<https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4581> ? -- Roberto Spadim

1 0

[Maria-developers] Implementing implicit primary key in mysql server
by Lixun Peng 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

Hi, As we know, InnoDB has implicit primary key if a table hasn't defined a primary key. However MySQL server doesn't know this primary key, so this primary key will not apear in binlog. When we are using ROW format binlog for replication, if a table has no any indexes, that's a disaster. If a table without indexes do a DML (UPDATE/DELETE), of course it will run a long time in master, but in slave, it still need a long time. It will cause serious slave replication delay. For example: binlog_format=ROW; CREATE TABLE table1 ( col1 varchar(32), col2 int ); table1 hasn't any indexes, if table1 has 100 million rows, I do a query "UPDATE table1 SET col1='xxx' WHERE col2=100", and this query will effect 1 million rows. Then it has 1 million UPDATE events in binlog. After slave received these events, each events should scan all rows!!! It will cause serious replication delay! I saw:https://kb.askmonty.org/en/row-based-replication-with-no-primary-key/ But if no any indexes, it still a problem. I think mysql server can do the same thing as InnoDB do, if user doesn't define the primary key, mysql can add the primary key automatically. For example: If user create a table like "table1", we can do "ALTER TABLE table1 ADD __id bigint auto_increment, ADD PRIMARY KEY(__id)", so in fact, the "table1" structure is CREATE TABLE table1 ( col1 varchar(32), col2 int, __id bigint auto_increment primary key ); But when user do "SELECT * FROM table xxx" or "INSERT INTO table VALUES(xx)", we should ignore implicit primary key, "__id" will not apear in the result set. How do you think? Thanks, Lixun -- Senior Database Engineer @ Taobao.com Mobile Phone: +86 18658156856 (Hangzhou) Gtalk: penglixun(at)gmail.com Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/plinux Blog: http://www.penglixun.com

1 0

[Maria-developers] close some mdev
by Roberto Spadim 17 Jun '13

17 Jun '13

hi guys could anyone close some opened and fixed (won't fix) mdev's ? the comment explain why to close it 1. MDEV-4571 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4571> 1. MDEV-4583 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4583> 1. MDEV-4589 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-4589> 1. MDEV-575 <https://mariadb.atlassian.net/browse/MDEV-575> -- Roberto Spadim SPAEmpresarial

1 0