May 2019 - developers - lists.mariadb.org

Re: [Maria-developers] MDEV-19284-19285v3
by Eugene Kosov 14 May '19

14 May '19

Hi, Alexander! Patch looks good to me. 13.05.2019, 17:03, "Alexander Barkov" <bar(a)mariadb.com>: > Hi Eugene, > > Please review the next round of the patch. > > Are any changes in tests still needed? > > Thanks! -- Eugene

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] 7198e7c71fc: MDEV-15458 Segfault in heap_scan() upon UPDATE after ADD SYSTEM VERSIONING
by Sergei Golubchik 13 May '19

13 May '19

Hi, Aleksey! On Dec 23, Aleksey Midenkov wrote: > revision-id: 7198e7c71fc (versioning-1.0.6-82-g7198e7c71fc) > parent(s): 6be155757b7 > author: Aleksey Midenkov <midenok(a)gmail.com> > committer: Aleksey Midenkov <midenok(a)gmail.com> > timestamp: 2018-12-20 13:25:00 +0300 > message: > > MDEV-15458 Segfault in heap_scan() upon UPDATE after ADD SYSTEM VERSIONING > > * HA_EXTRA_REMEMBER_POS, HA_EXTRA_RESTORE_POS for HEAP storage engine > * Versioning tests support As far as I can see, there are two approaches to fixing this bug. And if we go the way of HA_EXTRA_REMEMBER_POS/HA_EXTRA_RESTORE_POS then your fix is good. But I'd still like to understand whether write_row is supposed to disturb the scan. Why should heap_write() overwrite info->current_ptr=pos and info->current_hash_ptr? Inserting a row doesn't happen at the "current position", so I don't quite understand why it modifies current_ptr at all. There is no functionality like "continue the scan from the last inserted row", right? It just doesn't make sense to me. Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

2 2

[Maria-developers] Welcome to GSoC 2019
by Vicențiu Ciorbaru 10 May '19

10 May '19

Hi! As you may have noticed a few days ago, you have received an email from Google that you have been accepted as part of Google Summer of Code. Congratulations on the effort to learn about the program, get involved and submit succesful proposals. The fun part begins now! If you have not done so already, please reach out to your mentor and seek further advice about your project. Each one of your projects can be implemented in multiple ways, some more complex than others. I strongly advise you to create a concrete plan based off of your proposal with your mentor and aim to stick to it. Your mentor can guide you to ensure you have a succesful GSoC. Remember that you are here to learn about Open Source, what it means to be part of an Open Source community, to interact with the community, all while becoming better programmers. Please take advantage of this opportunity and keep your technical discussions public, on Zulip https://mariadb.zulipchat.com, and on our developer mailing list https://launchpad.net/~maria-developers. By keeping your discussions public, you get the benefit of not only having your mentor see your questions but all of the MariaDB community. You never know when someone might lend a hand in case your mentor is not yet online. :) The mantra of our community should be that we are always welcoming to new people. Do not be afraid to ask questions. There are no bad or stupid or silly questions. The only key requirement is that you first make an effort to find the answer yourself and only afterwards seek outside help. If you can show a bit of involvement, the community will show you the same. I recommend that you agree with your mentor on some form of weekly progress reporting, via either a blog-post, an email, or something similar that can be publicly shared. Hope all of you will have a great GSoC! Vicențiu MariaDB Foundation GSoC 2019 Admin

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] a4be420c920: MDEV-19235 MariaDB Server compiled for 128 Indexes crashes at startup
by Sergei Golubchik 09 May '19

09 May '19

Hi, Vladislav! Thanks. That's pretty much the solution I had in mind too :) A couple of comments on details below. I've only commented on sql_bitmap.h, everything else is fine. On May 08, Vladislav Vaintroub wrote: > revision-id: a4be420c920 (mariadb-10.4.4-25-ga4be420c920) > parent(s): ee4a2fef181 > author: Vladislav Vaintroub <wlad(a)mariadb.com> > committer: Vladislav Vaintroub <wlad(a)mariadb.com> > timestamp: 2019-04-17 17:17:06 +0100 > message: > > MDEV-19235 MariaDB Server compiled for 128 Indexes crashes at startup > > With MAX_INDEXIES=64(default), key_map=Bitmap<64> is just a wrapper around > ulonglong and thus "trivial" (can be bzero-ed, or memcpy-ed, and stays > valid still) > > With MAX_INDEXES=128, key_map = Bitmap<128> is not a "trivial" type > anymore. The implementation uses MY_BITMAP, and MY_BITMAP contains pointers > which make Bitmap invalid, when it is memcpy-ed/bzero-ed. > > The problem in 10.4 is that there are many new key_map members, inside TABLE > or KEY, and those are often memcopied and bzeroed > > The fix makes Bitmap "trivial", by inlining most of MY_BITMAP functionality. > pointers/heap allocations are not used anymore. > diff --git a/sql/sql_bitmap.h b/sql/sql_bitmap.h > index 705a8d169e1..74866336a1a 100644 > --- a/sql/sql_bitmap.h > +++ b/sql/sql_bitmap.h > @@ -25,73 +25,184 @@ > > #include <my_sys.h> > #include <my_bitmap.h> > +#include <my_bit.h> > > template <uint width> class Bitmap > { > - MY_BITMAP map; > +public: > uint32 buffer[(width+31)/32]; Why is it public? > public: > - Bitmap() { init(); } > + Bitmap():buffer() What does that do? > + { > + } > - Bitmap(const Bitmap& from) { *this=from; } > - explicit Bitmap(uint prefix_to_set) { init(prefix_to_set); } > + explicit Bitmap(uint prefix_to_set):buffer() > + { > + set_prefix(prefix_to_set); > + } > - void init() { my_bitmap_init(&map, buffer, width, 0); } > - void init(uint prefix_to_set) { init(); set_prefix(prefix_to_set); } > uint length() const { return width; } > - Bitmap& operator=(const Bitmap& map2) > - { > + void init() > + { > + clear_all(); > + } > + void init(uint prefix_to_set) > + { > init(); > - memcpy(buffer, map2.buffer, sizeof(buffer)); > - return *this; > + set_prefix(prefix_to_set); I wonder whether init() method is still needed. You've removed it from the constructor. And if there's any other code that uses it, I'd rather it'd be using clear_all(). > } > - void set_bit(uint n) { bitmap_set_bit(&map, n); } > + void set_bit(uint n) > + { > + DBUG_ASSERT(n < width); > + ((uchar*)buffer)[n / 8] |= (1 << (n & 7)); > + } > - void clear_bit(uint n) { bitmap_clear_bit(&map, n); } > + void clear_bit(uint n) > + { > + DBUG_ASSERT(n < width); > + ((uchar*)buffer)[n / 8] &= ~(1 << (n & 7)); > + } > - void set_prefix(uint n) { bitmap_set_prefix(&map, n); } > + void set_prefix(uint prefix_size) > + { > + set_if_smaller(prefix_size, width); > + uint prefix_bytes, prefix_bits, d; > + uchar* m = (uchar*)buffer; > + > + if ((prefix_bytes = prefix_size / 8)) > + memset(m, 0xff, prefix_bytes); > + m += prefix_bytes; > + if ((prefix_bits = prefix_size & 7)) > + { > + *(m++) = (1 << prefix_bits) - 1; > + // As the prefix bits are set, lets count this byte too as a prefix byte. > + prefix_bytes++; > + } > + if ((d = (width + 7) / 8 - prefix_bytes)) > + memset(m, 0, d); > + } > - void set_all() { bitmap_set_all(&map); } > + void set_all() > + { > + set_prefix(width); may be better to optimize it? memset(buffer, 0xff, sizeof(buffer) - 1); ((uchar*)buffer)[sizeof(buffer)-1] = last_byte_mask(width); > + } > - void clear_all() { bitmap_clear_all(&map); } > + void clear_all() > + { > + memset(buffer, 0x00, sizeof(buffer)); > + } > - void intersect(Bitmap& map2) { bitmap_intersect(&map, &map2.map); } > + void intersect(Bitmap & map2) > + { > + for (uint i = 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + buffer[i] &= map2.buffer[i]; > + } > - void intersect(ulonglong map2buff) > - { > - // Use a spearate temporary buffer, as bitmap_init() clears all the bits. > - ulonglong buf2; > - MY_BITMAP map2; > - > - my_bitmap_init(&map2, (uint32 *) &buf2, sizeof(ulonglong) * 8, 0); > - > - // Store the original bits. > - if (sizeof(ulonglong) >= 8) > - { > - int8store(const_cast<uchar *>(static_cast<uchar *> > - (static_cast<void *>(&buf2))), > - map2buff); > - } > - else > - { > - DBUG_ASSERT(sizeof(buffer) >= 4); > - int4store(const_cast<uchar *>(static_cast<uchar *> > - (static_cast<void *>(&buf2))), > - static_cast<uint32>(map2buff)); > - } > - bitmap_intersect(&map, &map2); > - } > + void intersect_and_pad(ulonglong map2buff, bool pad_with_ones) make it private? > + { > + compile_time_assert(sizeof(ulonglong) == 8); > + uint32 tmp[2]; > + int8store(tmp, map2buff); > + if (array_elements(buffer) > 2 && pad_with_ones) > + set_all(); really? I'd expect that if pad_with_ones==true, you simply don't need to do anything to the rest of the buffer. > + > + buffer[0] &= tmp[0]; > + if (array_elements(buffer) > 1) > + buffer[1] &= tmp[1]; > + > + if (array_elements(buffer) > 2 && !pad_with_ones) > + memset((char*)buffer + 8, 0 , sizeof(buffer) - 8); > + } > + void intersect(ulonglong map2buff) > + { > + intersect_and_pad(map2buff, 0); > + } > /* Use highest bit for all bits above sizeof(ulonglong)*8. */ > void intersect_extended(ulonglong map2buff) > { > - intersect(map2buff); > - if (map.n_bits > sizeof(ulonglong) * 8) > - bitmap_set_above(&map, sizeof(ulonglong), > - MY_TEST(map2buff & (1LL << (sizeof(ulonglong) * 8 - 1)))); > + intersect_and_pad(map2buff, (map2buff & (1ULL << 63))); > } > - void subtract(Bitmap& map2) { bitmap_subtract(&map, &map2.map); } > + void subtract(Bitmap & map2) > + { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + buffer[i] &= ~(map2.buffer[i]); > + } > - void merge(Bitmap& map2) { bitmap_union(&map, &map2.map); } > + void merge(Bitmap & map2) > + { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + buffer[i] |= map2.buffer[i]; > + } > - bool is_set(uint n) const { return bitmap_is_set(&map, n); } > + bool is_set(uint n) const > + { > + DBUG_ASSERT(n < width); > + return ((uchar*)buffer)[n / 8] & (1 << (n & 7)); > + } > - bool is_prefix(uint n) const { return bitmap_is_prefix(&map, n); } > + bool is_prefix(uint prefix_size) const > + { > + uint prefix_mask = last_byte_mask(prefix_size); > + uchar* m = (uchar*)buffer; > + uchar* end_prefix = m + (prefix_size - 1) / 8; > + uchar* end; > + DBUG_ASSERT(prefix_size <= width); > + > + /* Empty prefix is always true */ > + if (!prefix_size) > + return true; > + > + while (m < end_prefix) > + if (*m++ != 0xff) > + return false; > + > + end = ((uchar*)buffer) + (width + 7) / 8 - 1; > + if (m == end) > + return ((*m & last_byte_mask(width)) == prefix_mask); > + > + if (*m != prefix_mask) > + return false; > + > + while (++m < end) > + if (*m != 0) > + return false; > + return ((*m & last_byte_mask(width)) == 0); > + } > - bool is_clear_all() const { return bitmap_is_clear_all(&map); } > + bool is_clear_all() const > + { > + for (size_t i= 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + if (buffer[i]) > + return false; > + return true; > + } > - bool is_set_all() const { return bitmap_is_set_all(&map); } > + bool is_set_all() const > + { > + if (width == sizeof(buffer) * 8) > + { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + if (buffer[i] != 0xFFFFFFFFU) > + return false; > + return true; > + } > + else > + return is_prefix(width); this can also be optimized to not use complex is_prefix(), but I don't think is_set_all() is used as often as set_all(), so it shouldn't matter as much. > + } > - bool is_subset(const Bitmap& map2) const { return bitmap_is_subset(&map, &map2.map); } > + bool is_subset(const Bitmap & map2) const > + { > + for (size_t i= 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + if (buffer[i] & ~(map2.buffer[i])) > + return false; > + return true; > + } > - bool is_overlapping(const Bitmap& map2) const { return bitmap_is_overlapping(&map, &map2.map); } > + bool is_overlapping(const Bitmap & map2) const > + { > + for (size_t i = 0; i < array_elements(buffer); i++) > + if (buffer[i] & map2.buffer[i]) > + return true; > + return false; > + } > - bool operator==(const Bitmap& map2) const { return bitmap_cmp(&map, &map2.map); } > + bool operator==(const Bitmap & map2) const > + { > + return memcmp(buffer, map2.buffer, sizeof(buffer)) == 0; > + } > - bool operator!=(const Bitmap& map2) const { return !(*this == map2); } > + bool operator!=(const Bitmap & map2) const > + { > + return !(*this == map2); > + } > char *print(char *buf) const > { > char *s=buf; Regards, Sergei Chief Architect MariaDB and security(a)mariadb.org

2 2

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] 0ff8b73b60f: MDEV-15777:Support Early NULLs filtering-like restrictions in the range optimizer
by Sergey Petrunia 06 May '19

06 May '19

Hi Varun, Please finally find the review below. The patch is almost there I think, but there are some minor adjustments that still need to be made. > revision-id: 0ff8b73b60fae40556f91d3959f20bf3cf182b28 (mariadb-10.3.0-947-g0ff8b73b60f) > parent(s): 15419a558370aeed9521b498c34d50f20a8d47a5 > author: Varun Gupta > committer: Varun Gupta > timestamp: 2018-05-15 13:53:11 +0530 > message: > > MDEV-15777:Support Early NULLs filtering-like restrictions in the range optimizer > > --- > mysql-test/main/mdev15777.result | 455 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > mysql-test/main/mdev15777.test | 138 ++++++++++++ > sql/opt_range.cc | 125 ++++++++++- > sql/opt_range.h | 2 + > sql/sql_select.cc | 22 +- > sql/table.cc | 1 + > sql/table.h | 6 + > 7 files changed, 745 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/mysql-test/main/mdev15777.result b/mysql-test/main/mdev15777.result > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000000..549ac08b91f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/mysql-test/main/mdev15777.result > @@ -0,0 +1,455 @@ > +# Test added to check that null filtering is used by range optimizer > +create table ten(a int); > +insert into ten values (0),(1),(2),(3),(4),(5),(6),(7),(8),(9); > +create table one_k(a int); > +insert into one_k select A.a + B.a* 10 + C.a * 100 from ten A, ten B, ten C; > +create table one_m(a int); > +insert into one_m select A.a + B.a* 1000 from one_k A, one_k B; The testcases are extremely confusing. * Do you really need a table with one millon rows to demonstrate the issue? * Why use examples with subqueries (which are converted into join anyway)? - if we want to verify that this optimization works together with subquery-to-semi-join conversion, let's start with a join example, and then construct a subquery which is converted to the query. * The testcases produce a lot of EXPLAIN outputs, and there is no explanation provided what one should expect. Please create a testcase: - of reasonable size (I think tables of 10-20K rows should suffice) - start from a join query - Like in other testcases, tables should be named, t1,t2, ... - I assume the query plan should be: range access on the first table (constructed from a NOT NULL predicate), ref access for the second one. - The testcase should have '--echo #' comments explaining what is relevant in the query plan > +delete from one_m where a=0 limit 1; > +create table t1 ( > +id int(10) unsigned NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT, > +filler varchar(100), > +subset_id int(11) DEFAULT NULL, > +PRIMARY KEY (id), > +KEY t1_subset_id (subset_id) > +); > +create table t1_subsets ( ... > diff --git a/sql/opt_range.cc b/sql/opt_range.cc > index 8422917065f..ae06b899ac9 100644 > --- a/sql/opt_range.cc > +++ b/sql/opt_range.cc > @@ -155,6 +155,7 @@ class SEL_IMERGE; > #define CLONE_KEY1_MAYBE 1 > #define CLONE_KEY2_MAYBE 2 > #define swap_clone_flag(A) ((A & 1) << 1) | ((A & 2) >> 1) > +#define FT_KEYPART (MAX_FIELDS+10) > > > /* > @@ -2400,6 +2401,7 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, > { > uint idx; > double scan_time; > + Item *null_rejecting_conds= NULL; > DBUG_ENTER("SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select"); > DBUG_PRINT("enter",("keys_to_use: %lu prev_tables: %lu const_tables: %lu", > (ulong) keys_to_use.to_ulonglong(), (ulong) prev_tables, > @@ -2423,6 +2425,7 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, > read_time= (double) records + scan_time + 1; // Force to use index > > possible_keys.clear_all(); > + null_rejecting_conds= head->null_rejecting_conds; > > DBUG_PRINT("info",("Time to scan table: %g", read_time)); > > @@ -2431,7 +2434,7 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, > { > uchar buff[STACK_BUFF_ALLOC]; > MEM_ROOT alloc; > - SEL_TREE *tree= NULL; > + SEL_TREE *tree= NULL, *not_null_cond_tree= NULL; > KEY_PART *key_parts; > KEY *key_info; > PARAM param; > @@ -2540,6 +2543,12 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, > TRP_GROUP_MIN_MAX *group_trp; > double best_read_time= read_time; > Please add a comment saying that as far as range optimizer is concerned, null_rejecting_conds is just an extra condition on this table. (That is, we don't care if it has NOT NULL conditions or something else). > + if (null_rejecting_conds) > + { > + not_null_cond_tree= null_rejecting_conds->get_mm_tree(&param, > + &null_rejecting_conds); > + } > + > if (cond) > { > if ((tree= cond->get_mm_tree(&param, &cond))) > @@ -2558,6 +2567,13 @@ int SQL_SELECT::test_quick_select(THD *thd, key_map keys_to_use, > tree= NULL; > } > } > + if (not_null_cond_tree) > + { > + if (!tree) > + tree= not_null_cond_tree; > + else > + tree= tree_and(&param, tree, not_null_cond_tree); This if-else logic is redundant, as it's already present in tree_and(). Can just have this: tree= tree_and(tree, not_null_cond_tree); > + } > > /* > Try to construct a QUICK_GROUP_MIN_MAX_SELECT. > @@ -14643,6 +14659,113 @@ void QUICK_GROUP_MIN_MAX_SELECT::add_keys_and_lengths(String *key_names, > add_key_and_length(key_names, used_lengths, &first); > } > > +inline void add_cond(THD *thd, Item **e1, Item *e2) > +{ > + if (*e1) > + { > + if (!e2) > + return; > + Item *res; > + if ((res= new (thd->mem_root) Item_cond_and(thd, *e1, e2))) > + { > + res->fix_fields(thd, 0); > + res->update_used_tables(); > + *e1= res; > + } > + } > + else > + *e1= e2; > +} > + > +/* > + Create null rejecting conditions for a table, for all the equalites > + present in the WHERE clause of a query. > + > + SYNOPSIS > + make_null_rejecting_conds() > + @param TABLE - Keys of this table will participate in null > + rejecting conditions > + @param keyuse_array - array that has all the equalites of the > + WHERE clasuse > + > + DESCRIPTION > + This function creates null rejecting conditions for a table. These > + conditions are created to do range analysis on them , the conditions > + are of the form tbl.key.keypart IS NOT NULL. > + > + IMPLEMENTATION > + Lookup in the keyuse array to check if it has equalites that belong > + to the given table. If yes then find out if the conditions are null > + rejecting and accordingly create all the condition for the keys of a > + given table and AND them. > + > + > + RETURN > + NOT NULL - Found null rejecting conditions for the given table > + NULL - No null rejecting conditions for the given table > +*/ > + > +void make_null_rejecting_conds(THD *thd, TABLE *table, > + DYNAMIC_ARRAY *keyuse_array, key_map *const_keys) ^ Please fix identation. > +{ > + KEY *keyinfo; > + Item *cond= NULL; > + KEYUSE* keyuse; > + > + /* > + The null rejecting conds added will be on the keypart of a key, so for > + that we need the table to atleast have a key. > + */ please fix typos/wording in the above comment. > + if (!table->s->keys) > + return ; > + if (table->null_rejecting_conds) > + return; > + > + for(uint i=0; i < keyuse_array->elements; i++) > + { This loop does excessive work. Check out how best_access_path() examines the KEYUSE array. Key points - the array is sorted by table, index_nr, key_part_nr. - JOIN_TAB::keyuse points to the first element that refers to the table described by the JOIN_TAB - The array may have "duplicates", especially when multiple equalities are present: KEYUSE(t.keyXpartY = other_table.colX) KEYUSE(t.keyXpartY = other_table.colY) KEYUSE(t.keyXpartY = some_expr) ... Since the elements are sorted by keyXpartY, it is trival to avoid generating multiple "t.keyXpartY IS NOT NULL" for consecutive KEYUSEs. I would go even further: the same "t.keyXpartY" can be part of multiple indexes (and so its KEYUSE objects will not be adjacent). Can we use a table's column bitmap to avoid generating duplicate IS NOT NULL objects? > + keyuse= (KEYUSE*)dynamic_array_ptr(keyuse_array, i); > + if (keyuse->table == table) > + { > + /* > + No null rejecting conds for a hash key orr full-text keys > + */ please fix typos/wording in the above comment. > + if (keyuse->key == MAX_KEY || keyuse->keypart == FT_KEYPART) > + continue; > + keyinfo= keyuse->table->key_info+keyuse->key; > + Field *field= keyinfo->key_part[keyuse->keypart].field; > + > + /* > + No need to add null-rejecting condition if we have a > + keyuse element as > + - table.key.keypart= const > + - (table.key.keypart= tbl.otherfield or table.key.keypart IS NULL) > + - table.key.keypart IS NOT NULLABLE > + */ > + > + if (keyuse->val->const_item() > + || !(keyuse->null_rejecting && field->maybe_null()) Please remove the brackets: !(A && B) -> !A || !B > + || keyuse->optimize & KEY_OPTIMIZE_REF_OR_NULL) Please also put the '||' at the end of the lines, like it is done in the rest of the code. > + continue; > + > + Item_field *field_item= new (thd->mem_root)Item_field(thd, field); > + Item* not_null_item= new (thd->mem_root)Item_func_isnotnull(thd, > + field_item); Please add error handling (just return from the function if we failed to allocate any of the above) > + > + /* > + adding the key to const keys as we have the condition > + as key.keypart IS NOT NULL > + */ > + > + const_keys->set_bit(keyuse->key); > + not_null_item->fix_fields(thd, 0); > + not_null_item->update_used_tables(); > + add_cond(thd, &cond, not_null_item); > + } > + } > + table->null_rejecting_conds= cond; > + return; Please remove the above 'return;' as it is redundant and makes one suspect a merge error > +} > + > > #ifndef DBUG_OFF > > diff --git a/sql/opt_range.h b/sql/opt_range.h > index bd85a12d4a1..894d46a892c 100644 > --- a/sql/opt_range.h > +++ b/sql/opt_range.h > @@ -1728,6 +1728,8 @@ bool calculate_cond_selectivity_for_table(THD *thd, TABLE *table, Item **cond); > bool prune_partitions(THD *thd, TABLE *table, Item *pprune_cond); > #endif > void store_key_image_to_rec(Field *field, uchar *ptr, uint len); > +void make_null_rejecting_conds(THD *thd, TABLE *table, > + DYNAMIC_ARRAY *keyuse_array, key_map *const_keys); Please fix identation. > > extern String null_string; > > diff --git a/sql/sql_select.cc b/sql/sql_select.cc > index f658b78c33c..4aceb333340 100644 > --- a/sql/sql_select.cc > +++ b/sql/sql_select.cc > @@ -4805,6 +4805,9 @@ make_join_statistics(JOIN *join, List<TABLE_LIST> &tables_list, > add_group_and_distinct_keys(join, s); > > s->table->cond_selectivity= 1.0; > + > + make_null_rejecting_conds(join->thd, s->table, > + keyuse_array, &s->const_keys); > > /* > Perform range analysis if there are keys it could use (1). > @@ -5352,15 +5356,24 @@ add_key_field(JOIN *join, > If the condition has form "tbl.keypart = othertbl.field" and > othertbl.field can be NULL, there will be no matches if othertbl.field > has NULL value. > + > + The field KEY_FIELD::null_rejecting is set to TRUE if we have both > + the left and right hand side of the equality are NULLABLE > + This is NOT what is happening. null_rejecting is set to true, if *either* left or right-hand side of the equality is nullable. Please fix the comment. Please also fix the comment in KEY_FIELD::null_rejecting to reflect that. > We use null_rejecting in add_not_null_conds() to add > 'othertbl.field IS NOT NULL' to tab->select_cond. > + > + We use null_rejecting in make_null_rejecting_conds() to add > + tbl.keypart IS NOT NULL so we can do range analysis on this condition > + Please join the above two sentences together: null_rejecting is used - by add_not_null_conds(), to add "othertbl.field IS NOT NULL" to othertbl's tab->select_cond. (This is called "Early NULLs filtering") - by make_null_rejecting_conds(), to provide range optimizer with additional "tbl.keypart IS NOT NULL" condition. > */ > { > Item *real= (*value)->real_item(); > if (((cond->functype() == Item_func::EQ_FUNC) || > (cond->functype() == Item_func::MULT_EQUAL_FUNC)) && > - (real->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM) && > + (((real->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM) && > ((Item_field*)real)->field->maybe_null()) > + ||(field->maybe_null()))) ^Please fix the identation. > (*key_fields)->null_rejecting= true; > else > (*key_fields)->null_rejecting= false; > @@ -9813,7 +9826,10 @@ static bool create_ref_for_key(JOIN *join, JOIN_TAB *j, > uint maybe_null= MY_TEST(keyinfo->key_part[i].null_bit); > j->ref.items[i]=keyuse->val; // Save for cond removal > j->ref.cond_guards[i]= keyuse->cond_guard; > - if (keyuse->null_rejecting) > + Item *real= (keyuse->val)->real_item(); > + if (keyuse->null_rejecting && > + (real->type() == Item::FIELD_ITEM) && > + ((Item_field*)real)->field->maybe_null()) ^ Please fix identation > j->ref.null_rejecting|= (key_part_map)1 << i; > keyuse_uses_no_tables= keyuse_uses_no_tables && !keyuse->used_tables; > /* > @@ -18538,7 +18554,7 @@ free_tmp_table(THD *thd, TABLE *entry) > DBUG_ASSERT(entry->pos_in_table_list->table == entry); > entry->pos_in_table_list->table= NULL; > } > - > + entry->null_rejecting_conds= NULL; What is this for? As far as I understand we are freeing the TABLE object > free_root(&own_root, MYF(0)); /* the table is allocated in its own root */ > thd_proc_info(thd, save_proc_info); > > diff --git a/sql/table.cc b/sql/table.cc > index a6e445d0d2e..097fee465de 100644 > --- a/sql/table.cc > +++ b/sql/table.cc > @@ -4597,6 +4597,7 @@ void TABLE::init(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tl) > created= TRUE; > cond_selectivity= 1.0; > cond_selectivity_sampling_explain= NULL; > + null_rejecting_conds= NULL; > #ifdef HAVE_REPLICATION > /* used in RBR Triggers */ > master_had_triggers= 0; > diff --git a/sql/table.h b/sql/table.h > index 6fd3f219914..50d47899b49 100644 > --- a/sql/table.h > +++ b/sql/table.h > @@ -1356,6 +1356,12 @@ struct TABLE > SplM_opt_info *spl_opt_info; > key_map keys_usable_for_splitting; > > + /* > + Null rejecting conds added for all tables so we can do range analysis > + on these conditions > + */ "for all tables"? Please change the comment to something like: "NULL-rejecting conditions for this table. They are created from eq_ref access, and used by the range optimizer". > + Item* null_rejecting_conds; > + > void init(THD *thd, TABLE_LIST *tl); > bool fill_item_list(List<Item> *item_list) const; > void reset_item_list(List<Item> *item_list, uint skip) const; BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer MariaDB Corporation | Skype: sergefp | Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog

1 0

[Maria-developers] [MDEV-18684] [5.5] memory leak
by Michal Schorm 03 May '19

03 May '19

Hello, can somebody please take a brief look to atleast evaulate, how hard it would be to backoport the patch form the latest library versions? https://jira.mariadb.org/browse/MDEV-18684 Thank you -- Michal Schorm Software Engineer Core Services - Databases Team Red Hat --

1 0

Re: [Maria-developers] [Commits] 5e23f561984: MDEV-18741: Optimizer trace: multi-part key ranges are printed incorrectly
by Sergey Petrunia 03 May '19

03 May '19

Hi Varun, Please find my review comments below. On Fri, Apr 05, 2019 at 02:59:17PM +0530, Varun wrote: > revision-id: 5e23f56198493ed19ac270759963f615324b2c49 (mariadb-10.4.3-162-g5e23f561984) > parent(s): 02d9b048a2ab549a3227a81e15ff2f8c45562a65 > author: Varun Gupta > committer: Varun Gupta > timestamp: 2019-04-05 14:58:39 +0530 > message: > > MDEV-18741: Optimizer trace: multi-part key ranges are printed incorrectly > > Changed the function append_range_all_keyparts to use sel_arg_range_seq_init / sel_arg_range_seq_next to produce ranges. > Also adjusted to print format for the ranges, now the ranges are printed as: > (keypart1_min, keypart2_min,..) OP (keypart1_name,keypart2_name, ..) OP (keypart1_max,keypart2_max, ..) > > Also added more tests for range and index merge access for optimizer trace > > --- > mysql-test/main/opt_trace.result | 276 ++++++++++- > mysql-test/main/opt_trace.test | 57 +++ > mysql-test/main/opt_trace_index_merge.result | 509 ++++++++++++++++++++- > mysql-test/main/opt_trace_index_merge.test | 112 +++++ > .../main/opt_trace_index_merge_innodb.result | 6 +- > sql/opt_range.cc | 281 ++++++------ > sql/opt_range.h | 7 +- > 7 files changed, 1079 insertions(+), 169 deletions(-) ... > +explain select * from t1 force index(a_b_c) where a between 1 and 4 and b < 50; > +id select_type table type possible_keys key key_len ref rows Extra > +1 SIMPLE t1 range a_b_c a_b_c 8 NULL 4 Using index condition > +select JSON_DETAILED(JSON_EXTRACT(trace, '$**.analyzing_range_alternatives')) from INFORMATION_SCHEMA.OPTIMIZER_TRACE; > +JSON_DETAILED(JSON_EXTRACT(trace, '$**.analyzing_range_alternatives')) > +[ > + > + { > + "range_scan_alternatives": > + [ > + > + { > + "index": "a_b_c", > + "ranges": > + [ > + "(1) <= (a) < (4,50)" In the example above, only the name of the first key part is printed, even if the second endpoint uses two. As far as I understand the code, just using range->start_key.keypart_map | range->end_key.keypart_map in print_keyparts_name will be sufficient to fix this. > + ], > + "rowid_ordered": false, > + "using_mrr": false, > + "index_only": false, > + "rows": 4, > + "cost": 6.2648, > + "chosen": true > + } > + ], > + "analyzing_roworder_intersect": > + { > + "cause": "too few roworder scans" > + }, > + "analyzing_index_merge_union": > + [ > + ] > + } > +] > diff --git a/sql/opt_range.cc b/sql/opt_range.cc > index 5ab3d70214d..1827e2fcaf2 100644 > --- a/sql/opt_range.cc > +++ b/sql/opt_range.cc > @@ -431,16 +431,18 @@ static int and_range_trees(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, > static bool remove_nonrange_trees(RANGE_OPT_PARAM *param, SEL_TREE *tree); > > static void print_key_value(String *out, const KEY_PART_INFO *key_part, > - const uchar *key); > + const uchar* key, uint length); > +static void print_keyparts_name(String *out, const KEY_PART_INFO *key_part, > + uint n_keypart, key_part_map keypart_map); > > static void append_range_all_keyparts(Json_writer_array *range_trace, > - String *range_string, > - String *range_so_far, const SEL_ARG *keypart, > + PARAM param, uint idx, > + SEL_ARG *keypart, > const KEY_PART_INFO *key_parts); > > static > -void append_range(String *out, const KEY_PART_INFO *key_parts, > - const uchar *min_key, const uchar *max_key, const uint flag); > +void append_range(String *out, const KEY_PART_INFO *key_part, > + KEY_MULTI_RANGE *range, uint n_key_parts); Why is this function called append_() while other functions that print stuff into strings are called print_key_value, print_keyparts_name ? The name "append_range_all_keyparts" is also confusing. The function prints a sequence of ranges. One can say it "appends" them to the trace, but that verb is not used to refer to this action anywhere else. Functions that print something into trace are called trace_XXX(), e.g. TRP_RANGE::trace_basic_info(), trace_plan_prefix(), etc. I think trace_ranges() would be a better name here. What do you think? > > > /* > @@ -2273,10 +2275,7 @@ void TRP_RANGE::trace_basic_info(const PARAM *param, > // TRP_RANGE should not be created if there are no range intervals > DBUG_ASSERT(key); > > - String range_info; > - range_info.length(0); > - range_info.set_charset(system_charset_info); > - append_range_all_keyparts(&trace_range, NULL, &range_info, key, key_part); > + append_range_all_keyparts(&trace_range, *param, key_idx, key, key_part); > } > > > @@ -2489,10 +2488,8 @@ void TRP_GROUP_MIN_MAX::trace_basic_info(const PARAM *param, > // can have group quick without ranges > if (index_tree) > { > - String range_info; > - range_info.set_charset(system_charset_info); > - append_range_all_keyparts(&trace_range, NULL, &range_info, index_tree, > - key_part); > + append_range_all_keyparts(&trace_range, *param, param_idx, > + index_tree, key_part); > } > } > > @@ -6398,20 +6395,9 @@ void TRP_ROR_INTERSECT::trace_basic_info(const PARAM *param, > trace_isect_idx.add("rows", (*cur_scan)->records); > > Json_writer_array trace_range(thd, "ranges"); > - for (const SEL_ARG *current= (*cur_scan)->sel_arg->first(); current; > - current= current->next) > - { > - String range_info; > - range_info.set_charset(system_charset_info); > - for (const SEL_ARG *part= current; part; > - part= part->next_key_part ? part->next_key_part : nullptr) > - { > - const KEY_PART_INFO *cur_key_part= key_part + part->part; > - append_range(&range_info, cur_key_part, part->min_value, > - part->max_value, part->min_flag | part->max_flag); > - } > - trace_range.add(range_info.ptr(), range_info.length()); > - } > + > + append_range_all_keyparts(&trace_range, *param, (*cur_scan)->idx, > + (*cur_scan)->sel_arg->first(), key_part); What is this for? I think this is not needed (at best). Range enumeration should start from the tree root, not from the leftmost element. > } > } > ... > @@ -15775,60 +15763,39 @@ void append_range(String *out, const KEY_PART_INFO *key_part, > > Add ranges to the trace > For ex: > - query: select * from t1 where a=2 ; > - and we have an index on a , so we create a range > - 2 <= a <= 2 > + lets say we have an index a_b(a,b) > + query: select * from t1 where a=2 and b=4 ; > + so we create a range: > + (2,4) <= (a,b) <= (2,4) > this is added to the trace > */ > > static void append_range_all_keyparts(Json_writer_array *range_trace, > - String *range_string, > - String *range_so_far, const SEL_ARG *keypart, > + PARAM param, uint idx, Is it intentional that PARAM is passed by value? What for? > + SEL_ARG *keypart, > const KEY_PART_INFO *key_parts) > { > - > - DBUG_ASSERT(keypart); > - DBUG_ASSERT(keypart && keypart != &null_element); > - > - // Navigate to first interval in red-black tree > + SEL_ARG_RANGE_SEQ seq; > + KEY_MULTI_RANGE range; > + range_seq_t seq_it; > + uint flags= 0; > + RANGE_SEQ_IF seq_if = {NULL, sel_arg_range_seq_init, > + sel_arg_range_seq_next, 0, 0}; > + KEY *keyinfo= param.table->key_info + param.real_keynr[idx]; > + uint n_key_parts= param.table->actual_n_key_parts(keyinfo); > + seq.keyno= idx; > + seq.real_keyno= param.real_keynr[idx]; > + seq.param= &param; > + seq.start= keypart; > const KEY_PART_INFO *cur_key_part= key_parts + keypart->part; > - const SEL_ARG *keypart_range= keypart->first(); > - const size_t save_range_so_far_length= range_so_far->length(); > - > + seq_it= seq_if.init((void *) &seq, 0, flags); > > - while (keypart_range) > + while (!seq_if.next(seq_it, &range)) > { > - // Append the current range predicate to the range String > - switch (keypart->type) > - { > - case SEL_ARG::Type::KEY_RANGE: > - append_range(range_so_far, cur_key_part, keypart_range->min_value, > - keypart_range->max_value, > - keypart_range->min_flag | keypart_range->max_flag); > - break; > - case SEL_ARG::Type::MAYBE_KEY: > - range_so_far->append("MAYBE_KEY"); > - break; > - case SEL_ARG::Type::IMPOSSIBLE: > - range_so_far->append("IMPOSSIBLE"); > - break; > - default: > - DBUG_ASSERT(false); > - break; > - } > - > - if (keypart_range->next_key_part && > - keypart_range->next_key_part->part == > - keypart_range->part + 1 && > - keypart_range->is_singlepoint()) > - { > - append_range_all_keyparts(range_trace, range_string, range_so_far, > - keypart_range->next_key_part, key_parts); > - } > - else > - range_trace->add(range_so_far->c_ptr_safe(), range_so_far->length()); > - keypart_range= keypart_range->next; > - range_so_far->length(save_range_so_far_length); > + String range_info; > + range_info.set_charset(system_charset_info); Can you use "StringBuffer<128> tmp(system_charset_info);" like you're already doing in other places of this patch? > + append_range(&range_info, cur_key_part, &range, n_key_parts); > + range_trace->add(range_info.c_ptr_safe(), range_info.length()); > } > } > BR Sergei -- Sergei Petrunia, Software Developer MariaDB Corporation | Skype: sergefp | Blog: http://s.petrunia.net/blog

1 0